Skip to main content

Me Mum's a Monster! - Hailey Morgan

There are so many thematic elements within Beowulf and yet, the one that I find myself the most attracted to is the least scholarly of them all. Still, each time I read bout Grendel's death and his mother's rampage of revenge, I cannot help but ponder the immense ferocity that many authors include in their motherly characters.

Many of us are familiar with the Mama Bear analogy which illustrates how, generally, most mothers are soft and lovable, but if their children are ever threatened, a whole new monster arises! Disney's movie Brave better displays this imagery (hence the reason for my title). 

Regardless, there are many other examples of this fiery maternal instinct. In Confessions, we learned more about Augustine's mom and the overt passion that went into all of her prayers about her son. She only ever wanted what was best for him, similar to Trevor Noah's mother in Born a Crime. In that story, we are introduced to the author's highly determined mother and, throughout the novel, are able to get a complete picture of the strong woman who raised him. 

To take a quick detour into fiction, The Scarlett Letter showcases another tough mama. The story follows the adulterous Hester Prynne as she raises her child, Pearl, having been outcasted by the members of her small village.

Everywhere you look, you can find examples of fiercely protective and determined mothers. This is part of the reason why Grendel's mother is so interesting to me. Not only is she a parent, but she is also a monster who has no moral limitations. When you combine a mother's rage with a beast's natural desire to do whatever it takes to protect her offspring, you're in for one wild ride! Along with everything else Grendel's mother is supposed to represent, I do not think that it is fair to ignore the uncanny illustration of pure power that blossoms inside a mom whenever you hurt one of her babies! Having ripped the teddy bear to shreds, Grendel's mother stands as the monster sleeping deep beneath the fluff.

Edit - Replied to Leanne White and Brooke Hutcheson.    

Comments

  1. Hi Hailey! I love your post! Throughout the story I have never really thought of Grendel's mother as a mother. She is a monster, basically devoid of any humanity, yet through your lens I see her in a different light. Your reference to the movie 'Brave' helped me understand her as a mother. I find myself almost sympathetic to her drive to avenge her son.

    ReplyDelete
  2. YES YES YES!! I was totally picking up on this when I was reading. I honestly think that she was just being a good mom and was being portrayed as evil by the author. I'd love to have a mom like Grendel... oops

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, Hailey! You made me view Grendel's mother in a completely different way than I've ever viewed her before. No one has ever drawn that comparison or gave so much slack in her defense until now. From her and Grendel's side, the villagers were the villains; she was just vouching for her baby (who was indeed a monster and basically slaughtered everyone but still..) Misjudged, underdog villains have always intrigued me!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I do have a little bit a sympathy for Grendel's mother. Her son was killed and that is horrible, but I have almost no sympathy for Grendel. He did not need to kill as much as he was, and as a mother she shouldn't support that. I love that you touch on the "human" side of these monsters but also still include the fact that they have practically no moral limitations. I think it shows exactly what makes a monster a monster. Love your post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...