Skip to main content

Pride before a Fall // Braylan Stringfellow

    Between lines 1202 and 1214, Beowulf is told the story of Hygelac the Great causing his own death because Hygelac decided that he had to fight the Frisians. Hygelac became extremely proud in his own abilities after he successfully defended his treasure. Hygelac's pride lead him to believe that he could beat the Frisians. Line 1205 best describes what happened to Hygelac by saying "Fate swept him away because of his proud need" (Heaney 85). 
     What happened to Hygelac has happened so many times to so many people throughout history. Someone becomes so caught up in their success that they think they can take anyone one and it becomes their downfall. You would think that people would see this and would try to stay humble and not get prideful, but pride is so deceptive in that you won't realize until its too late. Falling victim to pride is as much of a danger to Christians as it is to the world that the same thing can happen to us. It happened to King David. It can easily be avoided, however, if we remember to keep God first and give him credit for giving us the ability to do something instead of us taking all the credit.

I commented on Caroline's and Emmett's post

Comments

  1. I agree with you, Braylan, pride is the biggest downfall of man, especially in our relationship to God. It will be interesting to see why that particular story was placed into "Beowulf". Was it because the writer wanted to preserve that "history"? Or maybe it was foreshadowing?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...