Skip to main content

Revenge Will Always Bite Back - Caroline Tucker

 I think all of us have been in a literature class long enough to know that revenge always backfires. I am looking at you, Iliad. I find it interesting that in every story we have read so far, revenge has been a common denominator. I do not understand why people never figured out that revenge makes things worse. Revenge plays a huge role in Beowulf. In the assigned section, revenge is twofold. There is revenge enacted by the mother of Grendel and by Beowulf. 

The first revenge is when Grendel’s mother comes to the place of Grendel’s demise and lashes out against the people associated to Beowulf (89-90). The second is when Beowulf hunts Grendel’s mother and fights her. Both instances involve killing because someone has been killed. This type of action is blatantly seen in the texts we read last semester. We discussed how when one kills it does not seem to stop. It continually shifts from my people being killed to me killing the people who killed. It is very interesting to think that this is how people lived their lives in that time. It was an endless cycle of vigilante justice.

We today have a justice system that allows for the cycle to end. Not only that but as Christians, revenge is a sin. In 1 Peter 3:9 it says, “not returning evil for evil or reviling for reviling, but on the contrary blessing for blessing, knowing that you were called to this, that you may inherit a blessing” (NKJ). This verse calls Christians to turn return with blessing not evil. So, not only does taking revenge seem to come back to hurt later, as Christians it should not be done at all, because it is a sin against God. 


P.s. I commented on Clabo’s and Emma Kate’s posts.


Comments

  1. Sadly when we look at today's society, the idea of tearing people down verbally and/or getting revenge is somehow acceptable. As we shift to God's kingdom, revenge and insults are both unacceptable. Revenge will not stop until that one person is satisfied. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You did a great job of pointing out how vigilante justice does not work. Although our modern day justice system is flawed, I'd rather have it than this endless killing that we saw in Beowulf.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...