Skip to main content

Self-given Blindness // Braylan Stringfellow

    Pride, its one of those things that can easily just sneak up on us. I wouldn't say that being prideful is something that people intentionally try to be, but there are just some people that are. Pride is one of those sins that has a whole lot of dangers to it if we let it consume us. I believe Augustine excellently describes one of the dangers of pride by using the scientific community of his day as an example. 
    In book V, Augustine is saying how the astronomers were able to use mathematics to predict solar eclipses way into the future, and that their predictions were right. Note that there is nothing wrong with what the astronomers are doing. The problem came with how they reacted to there predictions being right. Augustine said, "the astronomers are flattered and claim credit for themselves. They lapse into pride without respect for you, my God, and fall into shadow away from your light" (Augustine 93). The astronomers completely left God out of what they were doing. They took all the credit for something they did and not to God who gave them the ability to do what they did. As a result, the astronomers are in a shadow where they can't see, or blind. Because of their pride, the astronomers are blind from God's truth.
    If pride consumes someone so much to where they are blind from God's truth, they are in a dangerous place. The Bible puts this as hardening your heart. At this point, it is nearly impossible for someone who is not a Christian to become one. This can also happen to someone who is a Christian. At this point, we are not doing anything good for God, and we are failing as a Christian. What we need to do to avoid this place is to give God the credit he deserves, and if we see pride start showing up in our lives, we need to confess it and get it out before it becomes a huge problem.

I commented on Abigale Bell's and Hailey Morgan's post

Comments

  1. Hi Braylan! I think your assessment of the astronomers in the 'Confessions' was spot on! It's easy to get caught up in the excitement of an accomplishment (especially one like learning to predict the sky). I would argue that one of the hardest things to do is take a back seat when you've made a huge discovery or you have a special skill. Looking back on those astronomers, Augustine saw that their pride was pulling them away from God; from the one truly deserving of praise. I think this is a great reminder to us to give credit where credit is due.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pride one of the great ways to describe Book V. Our pride definitely has a pull on our everyday life and sometimes restricts any love for God. Back in Genesis, the Tower of Babel was a great human achievement. But it was a monument to the builders rather than God. How often do you think we build monuments for ourselves? We may not think monuments are super wrong, but when we find our value and identity in them, they take the place of God in our lives.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love how well laid out all of your thoughts are. We are created to fulfill specific roles, but we must have a certain humility to fulfill it. Like C. S. Lewis said, humility isn't thinking less of yourself, but thinking of yourself less.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...