Skip to main content

Singing's for the WEAK, don't tell ASOTA kids though // Abbie Hedden

 Well folks, you heard it from the Saint himself. He doesn't mind people singing in church, because it can move weaker souls to be devoted to God. I don't know how I feel about that sentence. The prideful part of me gets indignant, because it feels like he's equating liking singing with being weak. It reminds me of the verses 1 Corinthians 7:9-10 that say "Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion." My first instinct is to ask, what the heck Paul? Ever since I was a little girl, I wanted to grow up and find the love of my life and move in with them. While it's never been my priority - I'm of the opinion that what will happen will happen - the idea of marriage and partnership has always been on my mind. In this verse, it sounds like getting married is the last resort: something you should only do if you absolutely have to. If you take Augustine's comment and Paul's verse out of context, you get two very confusing and borderline condemning verses. Augustine, how could you ask us not to sing in church? The Scriptures tell us to "make a joyful noise unto the LORD!" Paul, how can you tell us it would be better to remain single, when God Himself commanded that man should cleave unto his wife?


It's a simple answer really. They're not saying that at all. Paul and Augustine realize something very important about good things: too much of a good thing can be bad. Aristotle's golden mean can shed some light on this topic. One must understand that Aristotle's golden mean illustrates that poverty and overabundant wealth in any possession or attribute are bad, having a balance between the two is a good thing. Augustine comes to a problem: singing praises can leave the listener focusing on the music and not on God, who is the point of the praise in the first place. Is the answer, then, to not sing? Augustine doesn't think so, and neither do I. On the other side of the pendulum swing from "too much noise, not enough worship," Augustine understands that praise is necessary and music is a good method of orienting the soul towards God when used correctly. A church without praise to God is hardly a church! What's the solution then? We must engage with songs and worship God in a way that is honoring to Him by remembering our motivation in worship. Similarly, in Paul's example, we should not sit out of marriage constantly wishing that we were married and forgetting about who God has called us to be; but neither should we get in a marriage and forget the reason for that marriage is to seek after God as partners. 


PS Hailey Morgan and Jessef

Comments

  1. As a member of the ASOTA society I am deeply offended at your distasteful title, I must say I expected more! Regardless, you make a good point. Augustine may not have meant that too much worship is BAD per se, he was simply trying to make the point that worshipping excessively for the wrong reason is bad. I agree that too much of a good thing can be bad. While my math compadres may not agree that a positive times a positive can be a negative, in reality it is possible. Take sugar for example. Sugar is considered good by many people (most of us would agree); however, too much sugar and you crash, and before you know it your body has taken a turn for the worst. So yes, I agree With your point about Augustine's statement.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...