Skip to main content

The Armor of Beowulf—Lily Caswell

In Section 2 of Beowulf, there’s a whole paragraph dedicated to detailing Beowulf’s armor. And to be completely honest, it reminded me of Ephesians 6 where it talks about Christians donning the armor of God. Ephesians 6:12 says that “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of the dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” (NIV) Beowulf put on a glittering helmet that was of beaten gold and “adorned with boar-shapes; since then it had resisted every sword.” (Beowulf, line 1453-1454) It then describes the sword with “its ill-boding patterns had been tempered in blood. It had never failed the hand of anyone who hefted it in battle, anyone who had fought and faced the worst in the gap of danger.” (lines 1460-1463) The helmet and sword really reminded me of Ephesians 6:17 which says “Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.” (NIV) I’m not sure how much of Beowulf is an analogy but if no other part than this is, I’m alright with that. Did anyone make this connection or was it just me?

I commented on Jamie’s and Kaitlyn’s blog posts.

Comments

  1. I like the analogy used describe the Armor of God to the armor of Beowulf. Beowulf had the armor to know that he had someone on his side to help fight his battles.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the connection! It's interesting that both instances describe the helmet and the sword in succession of one another. In my experience, the most emphasis is put on Beowulf's chain-mail armor protecting him against Grendel's mother. I like that you described the lesser emphasized pieces of his armor.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...