Skip to main content

The lineage of civilization... // Ian Blair

     The first part of Beowulf really painted a picture that the people of the age were looking for a hero that would personify the virtues that they wanted society to aim for. Much like the Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians before them, the people of the medieval era really seem to have been trying their hand at establishing a lore of the world around them. The virtues promoted include a sense of "honor" that is oddly based off fairness rather than might or glory.

    This sense of honor is explained when Beowulf begins a boast to Hrothgar and his company, and really sets the scene for the absolute brawl that would later break out between him and Grendel. After taking his armor off, he explains his viewpoint on the fight:

"When it comes to fighting, I count myself as dangerous any day as Grendel. So it won't be a cutting edge I'll wield to mow him down, easily as I might. He has no idea of the arts of war, of shield or sword-play, although he does possess a wild strength. No weapons, therefore, for either this night: unarmed he shall face me if face me he dares. . ." (Heaney, 47).

Making things fair in a fight versus a creature of demonic origin may not sound like a good idea to me or you in today's society, but this was actually a fairly common practice in duels and competitions like jousts. What Beowulf shows here more than anything else is a reverence to the supreme creator of the world. In other words, he demonstrates his faith in the Lord by leaving the outcome of the fight to the creator's will, a virtue valued in heroes such as Achilles and Aeneas by the Greeks and Romans respectively. This leads me to a conclusion drawn from both what we have learned from this semester so far, and from last semester's readings: A civilization must, typically, draw inspiration for its stories, lore, and its culture from its predecessors if it has no other apparent basis to go off of. 


p.s. I commented on Emma Kate's and Clabo's posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more