Skip to main content

A dramatical high ground... // Ian Blair

    Liturgical dramas are definitely an underrated part of the worship experience, especially in the time period that they experienced a wave of popularity across the known world. Some interesting details I picked up on were that lines of dialogue were chanted instead of spoken as if to simulate a conversation, some plays ranged from having two to twenty-eight characters (so actors would sometimes have to double up on roles), and the set design for these dramatizations drastically improved over the centuries with the addition of props such as ropes and pullies. The details about holidays such as Easter and Christmas being the most dramatized highlights where the people of the Church were trying to place a focus in the worship services they put on: The birth and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Interestingly enough however, the storylines of liturgical dramas that took settings from these celebrated events usually did not depict the actual climatic event of the Biblical story, rather covering the time before or the aftermath of the event. Some examples of this would be certain dramas showing Jesus as he revealed himself resurrected to his disciples or even Mary herself, but not showing the crucifixion previously. The use of stage props improved as time went on, and used mainly pulleys or ropes to move scenery or even actors:

“That this machinery grew to be extremely elaborate in some churches is established by Bishop Abraham of Souzdal’s account of liturgical plays he saw performed in Florence (Italy) in 1439. In one, showing Christ’s Ascension into Heaven, the actor portraying Christ was raised upward by means of ropes and pulleys to be engulfed in simulated clouds and then united with God and the Angels in Heaven (a platform located some 50 feet above the church floor).” (Theater, 76-77).


I guess one could say that Jesus' actor in the play previously observed in the quote had the...HIGH GROUND! Ok, I'll see myself out after how bad that one was...


I commented on Leanne's and Rachael's posts.

Comments

  1. These guys really did "set-the-stage" for all those involved in modern theatrics! And yes, I did mean to include that pun.

    Though it is really cool to think that these medieval actors were able to pull-off such astounding feats during their shows, I think that I would be a bit hesitant to trust the technology? Like, the amount of faith that these actors had in the props and pulleys . . . heavens, I could never!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...