Skip to main content

A Woman's Touch /////// Isabelle Ferguson


    There is an interesting female presence in the first and second cantos of Dante's The Inferno
    One female is mentioned in the first canto: the She-wolf. Dante encounters a leopard and a lion first while he is lost in the woods. They are described in around four or five lines, and he does not assign them a gender. However, the She-wolf is given seven lines, in which the utter despair she drives Dante into is described. Overall, the She-wolf is the most successful in keeping Dante from his destination. The She-wolf represents incontinence, or lack of self restraint. (Canto 1, lines 33-55) This "beast" represents despair and obstacles for Dante. She is keeping him from reaching his soul's desire.
    There are three women which have an impact on Dante's journey in the second canto: Rachel, Lucia, and Beatrice. "Why / this heartsick hesitation and pale fright / when three such blessed Ladies lean from Heaven / in their concern for you..." (Canto 2, lines 120-123). These women represent hope for Dante. Their concern for him lifts his spirits, and it spurs him on his journey.
    It's interesting how has the role of women has progressed through the literature we have read since last semester. Normally, they are presented in an unfavorable light. Helen is the cause of a war and so many deaths. She is blamed in the Iliad and the Aeneid. Dido falls from honor when she falls in love with Aeneas. She loses everything, including her life. The women we are reading now venture to a more positive light. The queen in Beowulf is described on multiple occasions. She is always performing an act of honor. Now, we have these women in The Inferno. Like Grendel's mother, the She-wolf is still representative of women being evil. However, there is progression towards good in female characters.
What do y'all think?

 P.S. I commented on Haley Riddle's and Abigale Bell's posts.



Comments

  1. Yes! It's about time too! I like the fact that these women are not solely judged by beauty, as we saw in the Iliad. These women are honorable and have good character, they are not seductresses, but they are successful.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...