Skip to main content

Beowulf and Goliath // Abigale Bell

 


What is a Christian hero in Beowulf? First, we must ask the question: What is a Christian hero? To go even further than that: What is a hero?

When discussing the role of hero in literature, we can usually offer three criterion that universally describe the protagonist or hero. 

1. Defeat an evil antagonist.

2. Meet rare and/or challenging obstacles.

3. Accomplish an impossible deed. Save the day! (Especially heroic when other great men have tried and failed to accomplish said deed). 

I'm sure most of you have these notes from class so I'm not really saying anything new. Except for a few cases, these characteristics can be applied to any story. Beowulf is no different. We see the main character, Beowulf, defeat Grendel and his mother. In the last portion of the story we see Beowulf battle a fire breathing dragon. He fights the monsters with inhuman strength; surviving the bare knuckles fight with Grendel, the underwater struggle with the monster's mother, and the firestorm of the dragon. Although Beowulf sustains deadly wounds from the dragon, he lives to defeat it. 

What, then, are the characteristics of a Christian hero? The story of David and Goliath in 1 Samuel has a striking resemblance to Beowulf and gives us an image of the Christian hero. 

Goliath, a pagan Philistine, "...comes out each day to defy Israel" (1 Sam. 17:24). In Beowulf, Grendel comes out each night to defy Hrothgar. David wants to defend the honor of the Lord and volunteers to kill Goliath. Again, similar to this story, Beowulf and a band of soldiers go to Hrothgar's mead hall to challenge the monster that plagues the Danes by night. Beowulf and David both acknowledge God as the source of their strength. They both know the outcomes of the battle is in God's hands. David straps on a suit of armor and then realizes he can't fight in the armor (Funny enough, this reminded me of the scene in the first part of Beowulf when he chooses to fight Grendel without weapons). He picks up a few stones instead and, armed with a sling, he faces the mighty Goliath. David fulfills every aspect of hero; facing a rare and challenging obstacle; facing Goliath when other soldiers have tried and failed; eventually, saving the day. There are so many other cool similarities between Beowulf and David and Goliath, but, to make a long post a little shorter, I'll move on.

The difference between the literary hero and Christian hero is the motivation behind their acts. David's motivation was to bring glory to God. When he faces Goliath he says, "Today the LORD will conquer you...and the whole world will know that there is a God in Israel!" (17:46). Beowulf, too, gives glory to God. He says this when he has defeated the dragon and knows he is dying: "To the everlasting Lord of All, to the King of Glory, I give thanks that I behold this treasure here in front of me..." (Beowulf, 2794-2802). 

The meaning behind these words is questionable coming from the character himself who is speaking from a pagan culture. But the author of Beowulf, at least, has attempted to bring this Christian element into the story; into the hero. 


Commented on Emmett's and Emma Kate's posts. 

Comments

  1. Hi Abigale! I gotta say, loved your post. You provided a really good outline of what a hero looks like and you convinced me that Beowulf is a Christian hero! Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love that you pointed out the connections between David and Goliath and Beowulf. I found it interesting and cool that you pointed out the difference between a literary hero and Christian hero and I found it very interesting.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...