Skip to main content

Burn In Hell...But I love you//Haylee Lynd

 


    In Canto XI Dante places three Florentines in Hell who he admires. He speaks well of them in this Canto as well as in Canto VI. These Florentines are Jacopo Rusticucci, Guido Guerra, and Tegghiaio Aldobrandi. These are not the only individuals who Dante places in Hell that he also speaks highly of with in his Inferno. My question is why place those you greatly admire in Hell, and quite low in Hell as well. The specific individuals are in the seventh circle of Hell. Their sin is violence against nature and art. However, Virgil says, "...these are souls to whom respect is due" (XI, 15). They were famous on earth. Guido Guerra, in his life, "won great fame in  counsel and in war" (XI, 39). Yet, they suffer for sin. I think it is fascinating that Dante lists so many of those whom he admires as Sodomites burning in Hell within his Inferno. I also think it is a great testament to how little earthly fame and reputation matters. It all passes with death. We take none of our earthly possessions with us, and our deeds amount to nothing without the Lord. 


P.S. I commented on Ian's and Emmett's posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...