Skip to main content

Christian Beowulf? // Abbie Hedden

 What makes a Christian hero? It's fairly straightforward. In Biblical literature, a hero is someone who is or acts like Jesus Christ. This can be in his selfless acts, defeat of evil, or sacrificial acts. Jesus selflessly came to earth and ministered to those around him. He will defeat the evil of Satan. He sacrificed Himself on the cross for our sins. Naturally, His actions are those of a Christian hero, because He is what Christians strive to be.  I believe that Beowulf does exhibit the characteristics of a Christian hero. He selflessly chose to fight Grendel and Grendel's mother, risking his life. He sacrificed himself at the end against the dragon. I would even argue that he knew he was going to lose - who thinks they're going to win against a dragon? - but chose to go anyway. In a way, he did win: he slaughtered the threat and made sure his people were safe. Like I said, it's pretty straightforward here if you look at those specific points.


PS Emmett and Abigale

Comments

  1. I can personally agree with Beowulf being Christ-like in the first two parts of the epic, but as for the dragon fight, I think he did more harm than good by sacrificing himself when he didn't necessarily have to. Beowulf could have probably brought a significant force of men and taken the dragon out while also preserving his own life, which would have prevented the Geats from being left open to attack because of there being no son to pass the royal lineage to. Good post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...