Skip to main content

Dante's World-building Workshop // Ian Blair

             Ok so first impressions of The Inferno for me so far: First, the continuity that Beowulf had continued by explaining the banishing of all the monsters that were in works by Homer and Virgil allowed me to plot a sort of time line in where the stories had taken place in this fictional world, and I was all for a continued timeline by Dante! But, and I say this with the utmost sincerity, the choice of creating what his depiction of the afterlife would look like and creating a whole other fictional world actually helped set the scene for the first portion of the story. Second, and the main focus of this week’s blog, I really have to applaud the choices made in the world building by Dante. I typically put some sort of music on whenever I am reading, and playing some mysterious/ominous sounding music while imagining Dante’s first couple rings of hell was terrifying to say the least. The inclusion of notable characters such as Charon and Minos just add on to the depth he’s adding on with each canto. 

            Another detail that struck me as odd was that there was a “limbo” circle where the souls there neither truly suffered or prospered, and were merely controlled by their human reason. Among the counts of the people in the first circle, Dante lists some very significant people throughout history:

            “Electra stood in great company among whom I saw Hector and Aeneas and Caesar in armor in with his Falcons eye. . . And raising my eyes a little I saw on high Aristotle, the master of those who know, ringed by the great souls of philosophy. All wait upon him for their honor and his. I saw Socrates and Plato at his side we’re all others there. Democritus who ascribes the world to chance, Diogenes, and with him there Thales, Anaxagoras, Zeno, Heraclitus, Empedocles.” (Dante, 30-31).

            My gripe with this first circle is that the souls of heroes such as Aeneas, Hector, and philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle are put on a green that just so happens to represent the pinnacle of all human glory. First and foremost, I have to question what kind of afterlife that would have these individuals seemingly excused from suffering with other wrongdoers when Dante clearly has built his fictional world off of Catholic beliefs. I get that these were the characters and past individuals who inspired him and all, but the theological retcon that happens here really threw me for a loop. I think as Dante descends further, we will see more of the maggots, creatures with weapons, and other hellish constructs that contribute to Dante’s version of hell. What are some of your thoughts and observations? 


p.s. I commented on Abbie's and Logan's posts.

Comments

  1. I myself am not entirely sure and do not know much about the time period in which Dante lived and wrote, but I think his beliefs and theology was drawn more from catholic thought. I think Catholicism affirms a version of hell similar to this and also affirms a place of medium such as purgatory. I am not sure if this helps at all, but I thought it might give a little insight as to where Dante found his inspiration for the hell that he presents in his world.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...