Skip to main content

Does He Win or Nah? // Jackson Riddle

Of the various questions given to us I will be focusing on the topic of whether or not Beowulf won at the end of his life. After ascending to the throne to rule the Geats, Beowulf is faced with his third and final challenge: the dragon of the barrow. His pride is his eventual downfall as he recalls his days of glory fighting Grendel and Grendel's mother, a time when he was seemingly invincible and could take on both evil entities alone. But now, 50 years later, age has caught up to the valiant hero, and Beowulf is no longer the powerhouse he used to be. Regardless of how age has affected him, Beowulf insists on taking the dragon down alone, ultimately succeeding but dying in the process. 

Before determining whether or not Beowulf won this battle, I think it's important to take a step back and evaluate not just this singular encounter but the entirety of his life. He served as a defender and hero of the Danes by ridding the land of Grendel single-handedly, defeating what the entire army of the Danes could not (or simply refused to) fight. He continues his journey by killing Grendel's mother after she advances on the kingdom in vengeance of her murdered son, and finally he becomes king of the Geats and defeats the dragon that plagued his people. Yes, he did die in his clash with the dragon, which some might say makes the battle a draw considering both parties were defeated, but I believe Beowulf ultimately won not just this fight but won in his life. He helped rid a kingdom of its demon problem, which in turn reinforced the relationship between the Danes and the Geats. He served as a valiant leader of the Geats for 50 years and defeated the dragon that plagued the land, essentially serving as an example for those to come of what a true and noble leader should be. So yes, I believe Beowulf won.

Edit: I commented on Logan and Clabo's posts.

Comments

  1. ClaboMarch 2, 2021 at 1:21 AM

    I also believe that Beowulf won at the end of his life. I mean, not only did he defeat the dragon and save his people from that evil, he also learned a very important lesson that he is mortal. I feel as if this ending was a good moment to close out such a heroic story.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...
3 comments
Read more