Skip to main content

Does Motherhood Make a Mother Good? ~ Madalyn Dillard

     Mothers. We love them. We have a special day every year to celebrate every mother whether it be blood relations or not. However, does being a mother make mothers good? 

    If one thinks rationally, motherhood does not include the automatic title of being a mother. Follow my train of thought. I promise this may make sense afterwards. Think of someone who birth another person, but was not sufficient in supplying the needs their child needed. I am not referring to a person who simply could not supply the needs, but someone who will not supply the needs for their children. This is not a good mom; some may say that the person in question is not even a mother. If you are familiar with an advertisement that is commonly played over the radio to promote adoption, and it talks about how a someone does not need to be a father in order to be a dad. I believe that the same principle resides in this post. 

    For example, a mother in Florida was proven guilty of killing her young daughter in exchange of a child-free life. This is a person that I do not consider a mother. No one who treats a child (nonetheless their own flesh and blood) deserves that prestigious title. 

    Now, how does this apply to Beowulf? Grendel’s mother was called into question whether or not she was “good” or “evil”. Comparing Grendel’s mother to the worst of humanity (which is kinda what she is perceived to be), she definitely, without a doubt is good. Even though Grendel’s mother took reverence towards the hero, she showed so much more affection towards her son when some mothers would have none. 

I commented on Logan and Isabella’s posts. 

Comments

  1. I really like your post, Madalyn. You make a very good point. To answer the question as to whether being a mother make you good, I would agree with you that just because you are a mother won’t always mean you’re a good mother. For the most part, mothers tend to be good, but there are exceptions as with the mother in Florida.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...