Skip to main content

Hard Question - Jamie Peters

Okay, I know that we talked a little bit about the treasure gained by Beowulf in the barrow, but now I am really getting into the discussion. It seems that there are contradictory ideas concerning the weapons and treasures of the past in Beowulf. On one hand, a common theme that runs throughout the story is the tried and true ideal, the belief that since something worked so well in the past, it must still work today. There are many places where this idea is prevalent, like the armor bestowed upon Wiglaf or Beowulf's sword Naegling, which, "...infallible before that day, / failed when he unsheathed it, as it never should have" (2620-2625, 2585-2586). Like many items we in the present hold dear, like the Bible, the sword and armor featured above have gone through the test of time and succeeded; therefore, they will last forever in their owners' minds.

In contrast, all the items that had been proven true before Beowulf's time suddenly fell to pieces, disproving their theory. Furthermore, when these items failed, death was inevitable. That inevitability applied to both Beowulf and Beowulf's people because, although their hero had endured much, as soon as he died, their world was soon to follow. The reason for me pointing these things out is to try and answer the question "Did the people in this work really trust these relics of the past, or were they just objects that pointed to the inevitability of downfall?" 


I commented on Haylee Lynd's and Logan's posts.

Comments

  1. Caroline TuckerMarch 1, 2021 at 3:48 PM

    This idea is still prevalent in today’s culture and time. We, as Christians, need to remember that in the end all will fail or melt away. The only thing that will stay constant and will outlast time is God. This is something I have to remind myself constantly. I need to remind myself that all but God will fail me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. IsabelleMarch 2, 2021 at 9:19 AM

    The continuous theme of worldly things failing at the worst possible moment is prevalent in the works we are reading. Augustine's reliance on worldly pleasures and knowledge led him to misery until he converted. Everyman expected his "goods" to go with him in death. Beowulf's old and new swords break in a fights against monsters. I believe the answer to this question is worldly things will always fail. It is important to trust in the Holy Spirit instead of a trusty sword.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more