Skip to main content

The Desires of Limbo - Caroline Tucker

 Dante’s Inferno is a very interesting read with a lot of interesting symbolisms and concepts. There is so much that can be discussed and even argued about. One thing I found very interesting is the concept of Limbo. Limbo seems to be a place of peace and of longing. At first, it does not show that there is punishment. That is because it is full of people who “were sinless. And still their merits fail, / for they lacked Baptism’s grace” (Dante, 33-35). They lacked sin but were not saved. Because of this, they were cast into limbo. Limbo is full of philosophers, mathematicians, and heroes. Mainly, it was full of smart people who did not know God. The thing about Limbo I find interesting is that at first glance it does not punish. If we look deeper, however, it is seen that there is an underlying punishment. The punishment is that they all are held by their desire (42). From what I could gather, Dante is not very clear as to what the desire is. I believe that there are two possibilities for what they are desiring. The first is that they desire knowing the answer to how to get to heaven and not be in hell. The second is that they know the answer which makes them desire to go to heaven. Depending on which is the correct answer, changes the concept of the punishment of Limbo.

What are your thoughts?


P.s. I commented on Madalyn’s and Addison’s posts.

Comments

  1. Lily CaswellMarch 15, 2021 at 8:43 PM

    While reading this, I thought it was kind of weird how all the inhabitants of the circles of Hell were being punished according to their sins while those in Limbo were seemingly being not punished. I think it’s probably the first possibility that is their punishment: they want to know why they’re in Hell and not Heaven

    ReplyDelete
  2. abbieheddenMarch 15, 2021 at 9:43 PM

    It reminds me a lot of The Good Place to be honest! It's a show regarding a lot of religions' viewpoints on what happens after we die. In The Good Place, the main character Eleanor Shellstrop says that "medium people" should go to a medium place, like Cincinnati. I like the idea, but it kind of goes against what I believe regarding sin. Once you have sinned against God, you have infinitely sinned as He is infinitely holy. Very interesting concept!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Logan TurnerMarch 16, 2021 at 9:43 AM

    Yeah, that actually makes sense. I always wondered why Limbo is technically a part of Hell, but the residents are not getting punished in any obvious way. I suppose their punishment being the fact that they know they can't go to Heaven, or be damned in Hell is their punishment in and of itself.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more