Skip to main content

The First Fan Fic - Hailey Morgan

I said this same thing when reading John Milton's Paradise Lost, but Dante is going to be receiving a bit more credit since he, apparently, did it first. And to what am I referring, you ask? Well, isn't it obvious? This so-called Divine Comedy is no mere epic, no! It it something far more important . . . This trilogy is the world's first original fan-fic!

While this may seem like a very non-scholarly topic to write about, I feel as though it is extremely vital to the betterment of this class to point out each of the scarily accurate similarities.

To begin, Dante's Divine Comedy can be correctly classified as a self-insert fan-fiction. Unlike Milton's now-famous fan-fic, Paradise Lost, which was written as a mere re-telling of a classic tale, the Italian poet had to be a bit more creative. Dante decided to write about his take on the afterlife and, instead of publishing a lengthy philosophical work, he decided to produce a much more thrilling, first-person adventure story! I can only imagine what the Wattpad tags might have been . . . 

Within the first section of the work, Inferno, we see Dante unfortunately traipsing through the streets of Hell. However, he is blessed enough to not have to traverse this perilous land alone, no! Dante is lucky because his idol, Virgil, just so happens to be there to guide him! The fact that the Italian poet not only adds his favorite writer to this tale, but also faints in his arms a couple of times only adds more fuel to the fan-fiction fire. 

Now, Virgil is not the only famous person Dante gets to run into! Along the way, the duo also meet Homer, Horace, Ovid, Lucan, Helen, and even Cleopatra! In fact, the only oc (original character) that Dante includes in this tale is Francesca. Ironically enough, Dante connects this character, at least in some ways, to the scandalously legendary myth of Sir Lancelot and Lady Guinevere. I mean, if connecting your oc's to the preexisting cannon isn't a fan-fic worthy tactic, then I don't know what is!

Finally, Dante does not neglect to include his crush, Beatrice, in the story. After all, no fan-fiction would be complete without a self-insert character who finally gets to freely love their crush! Though the two are still very much separated, hearing that his dream girl cared enough about him to send his idol as his personal guide through Hell is more than enough to earn Dante the "hopeless romantic" award.

On that note, I am finished. Please forgive me for the wretched travesty that you were all just forced to read. I hate myself, too.

Edit - Replied to Brooke Hutcheson and Jamie Peters.


Comments

  1. Hailey, you never cease to amaze me with your big imagination. I never thought of Inferno as a fan-fic, but I see it now. I guess anyone can write a fan-fic about anything (like the depths of Hell XD). Dante really brought many different genres into The Inferno like fantasy, fiction, epic, fan-fiction, etc. Do you believe Beatrice and Dante are canon?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is hilarious. Now that you pointed it out, Dante spends most of his time in hell swooning over the greatness of Virgil, not to mention listing a bunch of other historical figures down there (sheesh, are there any historical figures left to be in heaven?). It's a little out of place, to be honest. It's like that crossover Disney channel special that's so absurd it takes away from the plot altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I CAN'T BELIEVE I DIDN'T SEE THIS BEFORE! Once again, Hailey, you have shown me an entirely new side to a work. All I saw was a slightly cringey metaphorical "walk through hell". Now that I have this side of the story, I think I will enjoy Dante more!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...