Skip to main content

Tolkien in Dante // Abbie Hedden

 This is my second post about Tolkien this semester but I am unashamed. I have always loved Tolkien but I never really realized all of the greats he pulled from to create his works. While reading Canto III, I realized something about Tolkien. His portrayal of The Paths of the Dead is parallel to Dante's description of the Gate to Hell. Enscribed on Dante's Gate is "Abandon all hope, you who enter here". Meanwhile, Tolkien's Path is described in a manner that highlighted its sublime eeriness and hopelessness. Both caves host ghosts who are caught in an almost-hell, or ante-Inferno. Tolkien's ghosts are damned to stay behind as they are cursed for abandoning their oath to protect the heir of Gondor. They are in-between, not quite living and not quite dead. This is similar to Dante's souls who are in the ante-Inferno; they are in the Medium-place. While they did not commit enough bad to merit Hell, they did not commit enough good to earn Heaven. This is very reminiscent of Tolkien. Dante's souls are continually tormented by flies and wasps and worms. Tolkien's ghosts could not rest in peace until they fulfilled their oath. I need to reread The Lord of the Rings now with an understading of Dante and see if I can find more parallels!


PS Caroline and Hailey Morgan

Comments

  1. Ian BlairMarch 16, 2021 at 7:07 AM

    I always love a good The Lord of the Rings reference any day of the week! I think it's important when we read some of these great authors to not just realize what they are creating, but also to realize the works they were inspired from so as to fully understand how they came up with certain aspects of their worlds. The ghosts of Gondor definitely creeped me out the first time I saw them, and the lore behind them certainly doesn't help that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more