Skip to main content

Video Games and Dante - Hailey Morgan

The one aspect of Purgatory that took me forever to get over is how backwards it all seemed to be. After all, in Hell, the deeper you travel the worse it becomes. This is a pretty standard set-up and was very unproblematic as the whole idea moved along in a seamless downwards spiral. And then, the mountain!

While I understand that this knowledge is entirely composed of basic video game tendencies, it killed me how the higher you climbed in Purgatory, the easier it all became! Like, huh? I was reading Dante and thinking, "What cheat codes did you apply, sir? 'Cause unless I'm mistaken, a boss battle is in order once you reach the top of this thing!" But, no. Sadly, Dante is not a video game developer.

Instead, he breaks-in each of his characters at the very start of the journey, weeding-out the determined from the dull. Even though everyone in this area is destined for Heaven, those who are more eager to climb reach their final destination much sooner than their lazy colleagues. These adventurous spirits are always rewarded as the closer they come to the top of the mount, the nearer they get to God. As they get closer and closer to their Lord, the journey becomes easier and easier. 

Even though it took me a minute to separate this method from that of literally any video game ever produced, Dante's structure does make a lot of sense! Still, it would have been fun to see Dante battle an angel or something to ultimately prove his worth. Like, yeah the mountain was a trial in and of itself, but a little more action could have been entertaining! 

Or maybe you could just solve a riddle? Do a little puzzle? Play a fancy song on your harp as your guide gracefully dances around you-- no, wait. That's Skyward Sword . . . Yeah, this isn't the Legend of Zelda, so scratch that idea . . .

 Edit - Replied to Brooke Hutcheson and Ian Blair.

Comments

  1. Oh, my gosh! Hailey, I never thought of Dante's Inferno like playing a video game with boss levels! It is interesting how each level in Hell is for a certain type of sinner. I wonder if Dante was dividing people based off of how society viewed certain sins. Some sins could be seen as worse than others to society.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is potentially the best/ most interestingly thought out and most enjoyable commentary of Dante I have read. I like the way you related it to your knowledge of video games, and explained it in such away that someone like me, who has very limited knowledge of video games, could understand perfectly! Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love video games. Maybe Dante was just getting tired of writing encounters, so he just took the easy route. Who knows. It kinda makes sense if you think of it as habitually following God. Because, once someone makes things habitual, it is easier to follow them almost subconsciously. But, that is the only reason I can think of.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Reading your post, I found myself nodding along to several of the points you made. It would have been for real epic if Dante had to fight a big battle at the top, but no, he had to give us a conclusion of sheer disappointment. Seems a bit backwards for me, because in all actuality, the more we get closer to God, the more Satan will try to throw us curveballs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...