Skip to main content

Video Games and Dante - Hailey Morgan

The one aspect of Purgatory that took me forever to get over is how backwards it all seemed to be. After all, in Hell, the deeper you travel the worse it becomes. This is a pretty standard set-up and was very unproblematic as the whole idea moved along in a seamless downwards spiral. And then, the mountain!

While I understand that this knowledge is entirely composed of basic video game tendencies, it killed me how the higher you climbed in Purgatory, the easier it all became! Like, huh? I was reading Dante and thinking, "What cheat codes did you apply, sir? 'Cause unless I'm mistaken, a boss battle is in order once you reach the top of this thing!" But, no. Sadly, Dante is not a video game developer.

Instead, he breaks-in each of his characters at the very start of the journey, weeding-out the determined from the dull. Even though everyone in this area is destined for Heaven, those who are more eager to climb reach their final destination much sooner than their lazy colleagues. These adventurous spirits are always rewarded as the closer they come to the top of the mount, the nearer they get to God. As they get closer and closer to their Lord, the journey becomes easier and easier. 

Even though it took me a minute to separate this method from that of literally any video game ever produced, Dante's structure does make a lot of sense! Still, it would have been fun to see Dante battle an angel or something to ultimately prove his worth. Like, yeah the mountain was a trial in and of itself, but a little more action could have been entertaining! 

Or maybe you could just solve a riddle? Do a little puzzle? Play a fancy song on your harp as your guide gracefully dances around you-- no, wait. That's Skyward Sword . . . Yeah, this isn't the Legend of Zelda, so scratch that idea . . .

 Edit - Replied to Brooke Hutcheson and Ian Blair.

Comments

  1. Oh, my gosh! Hailey, I never thought of Dante's Inferno like playing a video game with boss levels! It is interesting how each level in Hell is for a certain type of sinner. I wonder if Dante was dividing people based off of how society viewed certain sins. Some sins could be seen as worse than others to society.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is potentially the best/ most interestingly thought out and most enjoyable commentary of Dante I have read. I like the way you related it to your knowledge of video games, and explained it in such away that someone like me, who has very limited knowledge of video games, could understand perfectly! Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love video games. Maybe Dante was just getting tired of writing encounters, so he just took the easy route. Who knows. It kinda makes sense if you think of it as habitually following God. Because, once someone makes things habitual, it is easier to follow them almost subconsciously. But, that is the only reason I can think of.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Reading your post, I found myself nodding along to several of the points you made. It would have been for real epic if Dante had to fight a big battle at the top, but no, he had to give us a conclusion of sheer disappointment. Seems a bit backwards for me, because in all actuality, the more we get closer to God, the more Satan will try to throw us curveballs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...