Skip to main content

What a Woman - Kaitlyn Terry

 Hildegard was a remarkably progressive woman for someone born in the late 11th century. She petitioned the church and fought against its ridiculous laws, wrote on theology, and was heavily devoted to the practicality and benefit of music. Honestly, I think she would be vehemently despised in this current day and age if she spoke against the church like she did. She was bold and held to her beliefs in a remarkably admirable way. I am truly saddened that this is the first time I have learned about her in my education. I have spent countless hours learning about men who spoke against the church, like Martin Luther, but never about Hildegard. (Granted she didn't start a new church but she still was incredibly progressive and should have been recognized.) I love how she stood her ground and fought for what she believed in. She did what I would wager almost no one did at that point, and she argued so well, that she swayed the church into relenting and allowing her convent to re-participate in music once again. She was revolutionary and I am astounded. I will promptly be doing more research on her and I may have a new role model!

Comments

  1. IsabelleMarch 30, 2021 at 8:19 AM

    Hildegard is one of my favorite women from history! I'm glad someone else sees what a boss she is. Unfortunately, our history records are very much upper-class, male based. You have to be literate to leave something for future generations. That's why Hildegard's music and story are so important! We get a glimpse into the female perspective of the past!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more