Skip to main content

Beatlemania in 1588? // Braylan Stringfellow

 I'm sure that everyone knows who The Beatles are. They are one of if not the biggest rock group to ever exist. I will admit that I am not a rock expert in any way so if something I say regarding The Beatles is wrong, then I apologize in advance. The Beatles were a British rock band that started back in the 1960s. They became huge in England in 1963 and then came to America in 1964. The Beatles were so huge in America that the press adopted the term "Beatlemania" to describe the enormous hype among the fans for The Beatles. In essence, British music invaded American audiences in the 60s.

That last sentence is very important for what I will talk about in this post. The phrase "history repeats itself "is very true. The Beatles take over in America has happened in history before. This was not the first time on nations music had an impact in another nation. In 1588, we see a very similar play-through in England with Italian music. There were some differences in the two events like the nations involved and the genre of music. Also no Italian band went on tour in England, but the same thing was achieved, one nations music had a huge impact on another nations population. I just love seeing history repeat itself in areas like this.

I commented on Isabelle's and Logan's post

Comments

  1. Ian BlairApril 26, 2021 at 8:44 PM

    It is certainly fascinating to see historical similarities whenever a great event, current or otherwise, tends to play out in a fashion that reminds people of a previous event. This historical "deja vu" has been noted over the course of the world wars, the colonial times of the late-eighteenth-century, and other time periods that saw the constant struggle of either nation versus nation, or even culture versus culture.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jamie PetersApril 26, 2021 at 9:44 PM

    I feel like the influence of other cultures on our own has been true for a very long time, especially in the world we live in now. What made this event so unique was the speed of transfer. I believe we have discussed in this class the isolation of everyone during this time period? Trends started outside of towns, hamlets, and villages simply never got to them; the fact that this one did says something about the popularity of these Italian madrigals.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Abigale BellApril 26, 2021 at 9:49 PM

    Hi Braylan! Interesting take on English madrigals, but I totally see the connection! I think it is valid to note that The Beatles were on the edge of a new era in music. They represented change in the culture of the time. I think the same could be said of madrigals in England. They were a new thing, representing change in the culture. Like every new thing, they caught on like wildfire.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more