Skip to main content

Dark Night of the Soul: Self Help for the New Christian // Abigale Bell

 


I found themes in this reading to be reminiscent of themes from my philosophy class. The language and message of St. John is very similar to that of Socrates as written by Plato. The same themes can also be found in Scripture. 

According to St. John, the "dark night" is a process of self-contemplation. For Socrates, this is the way to true enlightenment. Both Socrates and St. John of the Cross saw human emotion and desire as hinderances to the path of enlightenment. According to Socrates, the best way to live was to be totally detached from fleshly desires. The same idea comes from St. John. He also says the "dark night" or contemplation purges the soul of sin on two levels: the sensual and the spiritual level. 

The difference between these two schools of thought is their end goal. For Socrates, the goal was oneness of the body (sensual) with the soul (spiritual). This merging of the body and soul would, according to Socrates, would lead to ultimate wisdom and virtue. For St. John, the goal was, instead, oneness with God. He believed that the purging of sins through the experience of the "dark night" would result in unity of the soul (sensual) with the will of God (spiritual). 

Not only was I reminded of Plato's work recounting the words of Socrates, but also the words of Paul in Galatians chapter 5. He says in verse 16: "...let the Holy Spirit guide your lives. Then you won't be doing what your sinful nature craves." Here is a warning to resist succumbing to the desires of the flesh. The same warning is expressed by St. John and is an undercurrent in the teachings of Socrates (even if he doesn't give credit to the Holy Spirit). 

Comments

  1. Jamie PetersApril 12, 2021 at 11:06 PM

    Impressive observation, Abigale! I think that, the more and more we read works of literature, the more and more we see how each one of them is intricately connected, even if they were written thousands of miles and centuries apart. This concept also applies to the unity we find in Christ; our identity in Him joins us with other believers with that same identity, even if we have never met.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Braylan StringfellowApril 13, 2021 at 9:10 AM

    Good job comparing the Socrates with St. John. They both have a good point with emotions being a hinderance. Although we can't go completely emotionless, we should not make decisions based off of our emotions but instead rationally based off of truth from God's word. I think that is part of what is meant by letting the spirit guide us.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more