Skip to main content

Eyes on the Prize // Ian Blair

 The changing of times is never easy for those who have gone through life immersed in a culture that carried a certain set of virtues and values. The age-old debate of tradition versus change sparks conflict and disagreement between nations and across generations, and all seemingly without a clear answer as to which side is correct in the matter. This clash is further highlighted by late-sixteenth-century English music, specifically dealing with its composers, as Italian Madrigals began to take the scene by storm after the first translated works were published in 1588. The vast majority of Englishmen and women were fascinated by the Italian works, with musicians/composers such as Thomas Watson and Thomas Morley being some of the first to introduce the genre to England. An interesting aspect to note about the English madrigals that would follow this craze is that love is still the topic of choice, despite English composers/translators watering down the more obvious innuendos and references to passionate embrace. Many English madrigals regarded the monarch, Queen Elizabeth, as the object of praise, and seem styled very similarly to courtly love. It is very likely that the legacy of the troubadours and their poetry of love continued as the basis of madrigals going forward through the renaissance, and slowly found a niche in modern music. 

            Something I can’t help but notice, though, is that the object of the writers’ love, whether in madrigals, or cantos, or what have you, is typically someone else, perhaps even an abstract idea such as honor or something material like wealth. Maybe if we created a culture that sang about God and all of his majesty, we might be in a better spot morally. It’s almost comical how some sections of the global populace have been making the same mistake for over 400 years: idolizing the creations instead of the creator… But that’s just my takeaway on things for now, I’ll leave Saint Augustine’s thoughts on the matter here to…how do I say this? Complete the poem...connect the dots…you get what I mean: 

“But my sin was this, that I looked for pleasure, beauty, and truth not in him but in myself and his other creatures, and the search led me instead to pain, confusion, and error.” (Augustine I, 40).


I commented on Clabo's and Braylan's posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more