Skip to main content

Hear we go blind! - Madalyn Dillard

 In the Dark Night of the Soul, there is basically darkness everywhere. Might be foreshadowed in the title of the book *cough cough*. Anyways, the thought I had while reading this book was that we are also going through life blindly. We need to lean on God in order to get through the darkness of life. Sometimes, we have no clue what to do. We don’t know where to turn, nonetheless know where to look. It’s a shot in the dark, but instead of with an arrow, it is a shot with our own soul. We can’t really see God (how could we in a world with black-out curtains?), but we know when he is near. We can ask where to go and use Him as a guide. The Bible is our map that we can somehow read in the dark. Oh! One could say that the Holy Spirit lights our eyes to understand the Bible to show us the way. Yep, I’m going to stick with that. 


I commented on Hailey Morgan and Emma Kate’s posts. 

Comments

  1. Jamie PetersApril 12, 2021 at 11:02 PM

    Thank you for revealing the basic foundations of this work. The way you have explained it reveals a great source verse: "Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path" (Ps 119:105 NKJV). I think this verse and your post go to show how much we overthink God's Word sometimes, which St. John also talks about. It is refreshing to receive some clarity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. abbieheddenApril 12, 2021 at 11:38 PM

    I really love how you phrased your post. If you haven't read the book "Dawn" by Elie Wiesel, it's a book about spiritual darkness as well, only this is in the context of Nazi Germany. Now I wonder if it is possible for a human being to put up their own blackout curtains, as it were. Good post, you really gave me food for thought!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Emma Kate PattersonApril 13, 2021 at 9:22 AM

    I love that you related the book back to the Christian walk. It is very true that we are walking through life blindly and we must rely on God to lead us and show us where to go.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more