Skip to main content

I'm Too Tired To Think Of A Good Title~ Logan Turner

 Let me start off by saying: what? I was completely lost reading this. I think I gleaned a little bit of information, though, so this will be my thoughts on what little I could grasp.

So, the dark night as I understand it, is a spiritual journey of sorts in which the person going on the journey is deprived of something. I am unsure of what exactly it is, so I'll avoid that part. What I want to talk about is the purpose of the deprivation. 

The super-sensor theory is one that says that as we lose one sense, the others will become better to pick up the slack. Think Daredevil, who was blinded and whose hearing became almost supernaturally good. Now, this is a loose connection, but hear me out. The point of being deprived of something on the journey is so that our spiritual senses get better. This allows us to get closer to God on our own spiritual journey. The deprivation is so that we could gain something (a closeness with God) out of the journey.

 Anyway, that's my incoherent rambling over.


Edit: Commented on Jackson Riddle's and Isabelle Ferguson's posts

Comments

  1. Logan, your ramblings aren't quite that incoherent! In fact, when you mentioned a sort of 'deprivation' that made us lean on God more, I immediately thought of Paul's thorn in his flesh. He begged God to take it away, but God left it because His strength is made perfect in weakness.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...