Skip to main content

Level One: Press PLAY to Start - Hailey Morgan

In my last blog post, I was explaining how Dante's writing went against my general knowledge of video games and expressed my frustration at the overall lack of final bosses. That said, you can imagine my joy when reading Dark Night of the Soul as St. John's work could easily be formatted into its own adventure-style, 1st person, choice-driven game.

In fact, if someone were to make a little announcement trailer for this video game, the synopsis might sound a little something like this . . .

"The minute you press PLAY, your spiritual journey begins! Thrust into a dangerous world as a level one traveler, you must keep your focus on the King and listen to the warnings of all those who have gone before you if you wish to survive the Darkest Night! The more knowledge you acquire, the stronger your character becomes!

Your choices alone will determine your destiny as you battle against the Seven Deadly Sins on your way to Knighthood. On this perilous journey, your traveler will not only face external struggles, but internal torment as your own mind can often be your worst enemy! For every villain you conquer, your traveler will continue to level-up and move onto the next leg of the journey. But, beware! The farther you go, the nearer you come to your greatest trial: The Darkest Night. The choices you make not only determine how fast you will arrive in this valley, but they also decide whether or not you will be able to leave. 

So, what say you? Will you accept the challenge and obey the commands of your King? Or will you accept defeat and merely melt into the shadows of the Darkest Night?"

Rated E for Everyone

Welp, sounds like fun to me! Uniquely designed to be a multiplayer game, the journey becomes much less wearisome when you play with your friends! So, who's with me? After all, it's dangerous to go alone!

Edit - Replied to Brooke Hutcheson and Jamie Peters.

 

Comments

  1. Madalyn DillardApril 12, 2021 at 10:39 PM

    I love how you did the perfect video game advertisement which basically fits the entire scheme of the book! I will definitely be reading with that in mind from now on!

    ReplyDelete
  2. abbieheddenApril 12, 2021 at 11:45 PM

    Oh my goodness Hailey I love your post. You are so right in every way and I'm glad you brought it up! It's like Everyman, if only Everyman knew that he was going to need to make choices before the very end of his life. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ian BlairApril 13, 2021 at 6:41 AM

    This resonates with me so much! As an avid gamer growing up I definitely relate different sources that I read or watch to the games I loved at different points in my life. The way Saint John addresses various aspects and shortcomings in Book I reminds of how a guide to a video game is typically written; usually categorized by types of quest or certain areas on the game's map. Good post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more