Skip to main content

Perfect Illusion /////// Isabelle Ferguson

"Many such persons desire to be the favorites of their confessors and to become intimate with them, as a result of which there beset them continual occasions of envy and disquiet. They are too much embarrassed to confess their sins nakedly, lest their confessors should think less of them…"

On the topic of this issue, I have seen something similar to this within the modern churches I have attended. The pastors are the leaders of the church. For some reason, the congregation (myself, unfortunately, included) expects them be perfect. As the priests in the past, modern preachers are held to a higher standard as being a closer link to God. Thus, they are held to a higher standard. To heighten this issue, pastors have been known to put on the facade of being higher. With an image like this, people within a church are less likely to show their faults and even be afraid of doing so. Members hide their sins and weaknesses instead of boasting in them. Church becomes a place of resentment, instead of a hospital for faith. It pulls away from the purpose of Christianity. 

This thought made me remember a point from one of my favorite Tyler Perry plays. Everyone that goes to a hospital is sick. They do not go to a hospital seeking the opinion of Greasy Larry in the waiting room of the ER. They go to see the doctor. Thus, when we go to church for spiritual healing, we go seeking God. 

Thoughts?

P.S. I commented on Emmett Bryant's and Haylee Lynd's posts.

Comments

  1. Logan TurnerApril 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM

    I agree. We expect pastors to be perfect models of character, but we often forget that they are human like all of us. As such, expecting them to be perfect is an inherently toxic attitude; one that has led to resentment both inside and outside the church. Like you said, no-one cares about what Greasy Larry has to say

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haley RiddleApril 14, 2021 at 10:19 PM

    This is so true. The church should be a place where the broken come to find open arms, not judging spirits. It is interesting how we expect pastors to be better and closer to perfect when we teach that none of us can be perfect other than Jesus.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more