Skip to main content

Perfect Illusion /////// Isabelle Ferguson

"Many such persons desire to be the favorites of their confessors and to become intimate with them, as a result of which there beset them continual occasions of envy and disquiet. They are too much embarrassed to confess their sins nakedly, lest their confessors should think less of them…"

On the topic of this issue, I have seen something similar to this within the modern churches I have attended. The pastors are the leaders of the church. For some reason, the congregation (myself, unfortunately, included) expects them be perfect. As the priests in the past, modern preachers are held to a higher standard as being a closer link to God. Thus, they are held to a higher standard. To heighten this issue, pastors have been known to put on the facade of being higher. With an image like this, people within a church are less likely to show their faults and even be afraid of doing so. Members hide their sins and weaknesses instead of boasting in them. Church becomes a place of resentment, instead of a hospital for faith. It pulls away from the purpose of Christianity. 

This thought made me remember a point from one of my favorite Tyler Perry plays. Everyone that goes to a hospital is sick. They do not go to a hospital seeking the opinion of Greasy Larry in the waiting room of the ER. They go to see the doctor. Thus, when we go to church for spiritual healing, we go seeking God. 

Thoughts?

P.S. I commented on Emmett Bryant's and Haylee Lynd's posts.

Comments

  1. I agree. We expect pastors to be perfect models of character, but we often forget that they are human like all of us. As such, expecting them to be perfect is an inherently toxic attitude; one that has led to resentment both inside and outside the church. Like you said, no-one cares about what Greasy Larry has to say

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is so true. The church should be a place where the broken come to find open arms, not judging spirits. It is interesting how we expect pastors to be better and closer to perfect when we teach that none of us can be perfect other than Jesus.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...