Skip to main content

The Imperfect Perfectionist // Ian Blair

Ok, I get a bit personal in this blog post, so I hope my point comes across accurately. Hope y'all like the change in approach for this one.

Book I of “Dark Night of the Soul” seeks to address each of the deadly vices/sins in various entries, each continuing Saint John’s thought process forward through detailing a sort of purging of the evils within someone’s soul through intense prayer and spiritual practice. The entry that stood out the most to me in particular has to be Chapter V, in which Saint John details the pitfalls and spiritual shortcomings associated with the wrathful and sullen. Being a creative person while having a perfectionist side often highlights two aspects of my personality that I am not exactly proud of: my impatience and my pride. Saint John eloquently articulates the typical thought process of a wrathful person in entry three: 

“There are others who are vexed with themselves when they observe their own imperfectness, and display an impatience that is not humility . . . Many of these persons purpose to accomplish a great deal and make grand resolutions; yet, as they are not humble and have no misgivings about themselves, the more resolutions they make, the greater is there fall and the greater is their annoyance, since they have not the patience to wait for that which God will give them when it pleases Him . . .” (John, 14). 

This entire passage calls me out on a level I didn’t expect to be called out on today, but I think the first step to resolving a problem is admitting that you have one. From there, it’s all about holding ourselves accountable whenever we experience the impulse to act upon those problematic character traits. There are certain seasons of life where we are called to look inward and really question the kind of person we are becoming, and, to take a page out of Uncle Iroh’s book, what is it exactly that we are aspiring toward as an end-goal.


I commented on Hailey Morgan's and Lily's posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more