Skip to main content

This is Funny - Clabo

Honestly, I am not fairly certain on what to directly write about, so I am just going to discuss what I enjoyed as I read through the information about the English madrigals. I think that it was kind of funny when it said that the English almost took the edge off the Italian versions when they "Englished" them. I enjoyed this statement because it sort of reminded me why I enjoy singing in the ensemble I do. Yes, there are many songs that are serious and should be sung and performed in a serious and respectful manner, but being in a small ensemble of only 5 guys, there are also many songs where we just get to have fun. It reminded me that people already have so much serious stuff going on in life, so not everything we do has to be serious. Reading this section reminded me of this truth and it gave me more appreciation for the fun and almost silly songs that my ensemble does. Sometimes people just need a lighthearted moment to just laugh and smile, and that message not only applies to the audience, but also me and my fellow ensemble members when were on stage. 

Sorry if this may be a little off base from the reading, but it is just what I felt was fitting and what I got out of this passage.

What are your thoughts, opinions, and/or takeaways from this section of reading?

P.S. I commented on Hailey Morgan's and Rachael Gregson's posts. 

Comments

  1. I don't think you should be apologizing for reminding people of a very valuable life lesson. Life can be taxing on everyone to varying degrees, so it's good to remember that seriousness in moderation is healthy. The madrigals continued a trend of writing and composing music about the topic of love because love is viewed as an extremely desirable feeling to experience, and performers try to give their audience a small dose of that feeling whenever they write a love-centered piece.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree, Clabo. As we already discussed in class, the lives of these men and women consisted of rolling in the dirt and dying. Entertainment was a precious resource, especially fun entertainment that was legal; the Church probably had to approve much of these works.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think we all had the moment of “what do I write on”, Clabo. And I completely agree; our lives are in and of themselves stressful and we just need to remind ourselves that it’s ok to just put our busy jobs/lives down and have a source of entertainment to laugh at.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Honestly I agree, sometimes you just need to sing silly songs and have fun! If everything is serious we never get to escape from the dreary day to day life. I wonder what Augustine would think of the Madrigal we listened to in class that sounded like a barnyard...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Genre within music has grown rapidly. There's definitely many song out there that allow you to sit down and breathe and laugh. Some song shall not be named in this comment, but having that stress reliever to enjoy and be entertained by music should be an everyday agenda.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...