Skip to main content

This is Funny - Clabo

Honestly, I am not fairly certain on what to directly write about, so I am just going to discuss what I enjoyed as I read through the information about the English madrigals. I think that it was kind of funny when it said that the English almost took the edge off the Italian versions when they "Englished" them. I enjoyed this statement because it sort of reminded me why I enjoy singing in the ensemble I do. Yes, there are many songs that are serious and should be sung and performed in a serious and respectful manner, but being in a small ensemble of only 5 guys, there are also many songs where we just get to have fun. It reminded me that people already have so much serious stuff going on in life, so not everything we do has to be serious. Reading this section reminded me of this truth and it gave me more appreciation for the fun and almost silly songs that my ensemble does. Sometimes people just need a lighthearted moment to just laugh and smile, and that message not only applies to the audience, but also me and my fellow ensemble members when were on stage. 

Sorry if this may be a little off base from the reading, but it is just what I felt was fitting and what I got out of this passage.

What are your thoughts, opinions, and/or takeaways from this section of reading?

P.S. I commented on Hailey Morgan's and Rachael Gregson's posts. 

Comments

  1. I don't think you should be apologizing for reminding people of a very valuable life lesson. Life can be taxing on everyone to varying degrees, so it's good to remember that seriousness in moderation is healthy. The madrigals continued a trend of writing and composing music about the topic of love because love is viewed as an extremely desirable feeling to experience, and performers try to give their audience a small dose of that feeling whenever they write a love-centered piece.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree, Clabo. As we already discussed in class, the lives of these men and women consisted of rolling in the dirt and dying. Entertainment was a precious resource, especially fun entertainment that was legal; the Church probably had to approve much of these works.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think we all had the moment of “what do I write on”, Clabo. And I completely agree; our lives are in and of themselves stressful and we just need to remind ourselves that it’s ok to just put our busy jobs/lives down and have a source of entertainment to laugh at.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Honestly I agree, sometimes you just need to sing silly songs and have fun! If everything is serious we never get to escape from the dreary day to day life. I wonder what Augustine would think of the Madrigal we listened to in class that sounded like a barnyard...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Genre within music has grown rapidly. There's definitely many song out there that allow you to sit down and breathe and laugh. Some song shall not be named in this comment, but having that stress reliever to enjoy and be entertained by music should be an everyday agenda.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...