Skip to main content

Verne and Morley /////// Isabelle Ferguson

 "As a translator, arranger, publisher, and literary propagandist, Thomas Morley (1557-1602) deserves most of the credit for the English craze for Italian music that arose after the publication of the first volume of Musica transalpina in 1588." 

Italian music likely dominated because of Morley's influence at the English Madrigal School. I really wish there were more than this one sentence on Morley, because it reminded me of Jules Verne. He was a French author who loved Edgar Allen Poe. He grew up reading Poe's works, an most of his publications were written in similar style to Poe. Most notably, Five Weeks in a Balloon by Verne reflects Poe's The Balloon Hoax in being mixed between the real world and the "fantastic." While Verne's work isn't always as dark as Poe's, similarities can be seen within the two authors' lines. Verne even went so far as to translate some of Poe's work in his language to popularize it in his country. Poe strongly influenced Verne's work the way Morley was influenced by Italian music. 


I commented on Logan Turner's post and Abigale Bell's post.

Comments

  1. As someone who loves Edgar Allen Poe, I found that very interesting. It is a curious influence to have, but I am glad to know that he influenced writers and musicians alike.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm like you on how I wish there was more on Morely. He did a lot for the music of England, and for this huge thing he cause he should have more than just one sentence.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...