Skip to main content

And I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling GODS!!! - Abbie Hedden

I've always wondered about fate. We aren't robots, and decide things for ourselves, and at the same time, God knows the outcome of all things. I won't dive into an Arminianism versus Calvinism argument here, but a certain question seems to rise from the Iliad. If something is fated to happen, would it not occur naturally, without men or immortals interfering? The gods of Olympus interfere in the war only in accordance with what they know to be fated. In fact, they save and condemn mortal lives in accordance with fate. This brings to light two factors. The first is that they must self-fulfill prophecies. This is mind-wrenching. Instead of prophecies foreseeing actions, they see an outcome, and gods and mortals must act in a way that will cause the outcome to happen. It seems more logical to me that a prophecy is something that will happen no matter what, and therefore no one should act differently than they originally would. The second factor one must consider in light of the prophecies is that the gods must answer to someone higher than themselves. Many myths refer to the three Fates and the Oracle, immortals who are cursed with knowledge and only pop in to mysteriously share the prophecy of the hero's doom or triumph. Zeus has direct access to the fate of mortals, however.  Zeus mourns Hector before his death, citing all of the wondrous deeds and sacrifices that Hector had offered to Zeus. Athena chides her father: "what are you saying? A man, a mere mortal,/ his doom sealed long ago? You'd set him free/from all the pains of death? Do as you please-/ but none of the deathless gods will ever praise you." (Homer, Book 22, lines 210-217). Zeus then weighs the fate of Achilles against the fate of Hector, and Hector's sinks, showing that it is time for his prophesied death to occur. So Zeus must answer to fate, if only to earn the praises of his immortal companions. So, the Greeks invented gods that are not only flawed, but also answer to higher powers. Instead of worshiping a God who made us in His own image, the Greeks created gods in their own image. Why do you think they did that?


Commented on Clabo's and Abbigayle's 

Comments

  1. Wow. I might not sleep tonight because I will be thinking about this. I think it is interesting to compare the gods being created in human image while God created humans in His image. Wouldn’t we, broken humans, want gods who are broken like us. We could relate to the gods. It means that if we have an affair out of marriage, for example, and it be okay because Zeus did so as well. Then, look where Zeus is, he is the most powerful god there is. However, this belief brings no hope, no discipline, and no security. I am very thankful God is not this way. He is perfect and we (human beings) were once perfect but because of sin we no longer are. As a Christian, I have a just, holy, and loving God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...