Skip to main content

And I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling GODS!!! - Abbie Hedden

I've always wondered about fate. We aren't robots, and decide things for ourselves, and at the same time, God knows the outcome of all things. I won't dive into an Arminianism versus Calvinism argument here, but a certain question seems to rise from the Iliad. If something is fated to happen, would it not occur naturally, without men or immortals interfering? The gods of Olympus interfere in the war only in accordance with what they know to be fated. In fact, they save and condemn mortal lives in accordance with fate. This brings to light two factors. The first is that they must self-fulfill prophecies. This is mind-wrenching. Instead of prophecies foreseeing actions, they see an outcome, and gods and mortals must act in a way that will cause the outcome to happen. It seems more logical to me that a prophecy is something that will happen no matter what, and therefore no one should act differently than they originally would. The second factor one must consider in light of the prophecies is that the gods must answer to someone higher than themselves. Many myths refer to the three Fates and the Oracle, immortals who are cursed with knowledge and only pop in to mysteriously share the prophecy of the hero's doom or triumph. Zeus has direct access to the fate of mortals, however.  Zeus mourns Hector before his death, citing all of the wondrous deeds and sacrifices that Hector had offered to Zeus. Athena chides her father: "what are you saying? A man, a mere mortal,/ his doom sealed long ago? You'd set him free/from all the pains of death? Do as you please-/ but none of the deathless gods will ever praise you." (Homer, Book 22, lines 210-217). Zeus then weighs the fate of Achilles against the fate of Hector, and Hector's sinks, showing that it is time for his prophesied death to occur. So Zeus must answer to fate, if only to earn the praises of his immortal companions. So, the Greeks invented gods that are not only flawed, but also answer to higher powers. Instead of worshiping a God who made us in His own image, the Greeks created gods in their own image. Why do you think they did that?


Commented on Clabo's and Abbigayle's 

Comments

  1. Caroline TuckerAugust 31, 2020 at 10:16 PM

    Wow. I might not sleep tonight because I will be thinking about this. I think it is interesting to compare the gods being created in human image while God created humans in His image. Wouldn’t we, broken humans, want gods who are broken like us. We could relate to the gods. It means that if we have an affair out of marriage, for example, and it be okay because Zeus did so as well. Then, look where Zeus is, he is the most powerful god there is. However, this belief brings no hope, no discipline, and no security. I am very thankful God is not this way. He is perfect and we (human beings) were once perfect but because of sin we no longer are. As a Christian, I have a just, holy, and loving God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more