Skip to main content

Round and Round and Round we Go when we stop nobody knows.// Micah V. Powers

    Circling around a city isn't the best way to solve a quarrel much less save energy for a fight. Throughout the Iliad, we see Hector go to his brother Paris and attempt to raise him up in courage and muster enough intestinal fortitude to fight his fight, but in Hector's final breath of battle he convinces himself otherwise. I see Hector as RJ the raccoon from Over the hedge in this situation. RJ was very much able to convince others throughout the film to do the right thing in their eyes but when it came down to crunch time RJ couldn't pull through (until the climax but I won't spoil anything). Hector spends 40 lines (from 117-157) "probing his heart" to decide while he waits on his inevitable doom and then at the very last second what does he do? Run. I mean to quote Joe Biden, "C'mon man!" 
    "Hector looked up, saw him, started to tremble, never gone, he could hold his ground no longer, he left the gates behind and away he fled in fear-"(Homer 162-164)
    Not only do we see him run but we see him run for seemingly forever. I remember simple how tuckered out I would be from soccer excises just by running around the track. I was curious though: How far did they actually run? As I do with most things I googled it and then did the math. According to google Troy during that time was about 74 acres meaning its circumference, if it were perfectly round, would be approximately 1.21 miles. 
    "But once they reached the springs for the fourth time, the Father Zues held out his sacred golden scales"(Homer 248,249)
    "No more running from you in fear, Achilles! Not as before. Three times I fled around the city of Priam-I lacked courage then" (Homer 296-298)
    Three to four times they went around the city so they ran somewhere between 3.63-4.84 miles non-stop. That is a relatively useless fact that I just had to dig into. The most important thing I drew from book 22 was the power of Companionship, even though in this case it was false companionship. I am reminded of the very first thing in the Bible God said wasn't good. Genesis 2:18
     "Then the LORD God said,"It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make him a helper corresponding to him." 
    I remind you that for an entire chapter and 17 verses we are surrounded by God made this and it was good, but the first thing God says isn't good is man being alone. we see the fear in Hector and the actions of that fear and nothing changes until he thinks he isn't alone. In lines 276-292 we see his bravery return purely on account of not being alone. As kids if you had to run into anything dark it was scary but you would often do it if you had someone with you. Before I get to preachy here I am going to end this with the key thought I focused on: the importance of fellowship. 1 John 1:7,
    "But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin."`


I commented on Isabelle Ferguson's and Rachel Gregson's blog. 

Comments

  1. I like how you tied in Hector's fear when being alone (and literally running for miles, nice random-research,) with God saying it isn't good for man to be alone. I think in today's society, the word alone is used in tandem with everyday life much more, whether spoken out loud or being held within. Technology has created a facade of, "yeah, I have a bunch of friends, I follow them on social media", when in reality loneliness is a common pandemic of sorts that is often pushed aside or ignored. Good point!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't even think of that being alone in a crowd kinda of thing that social media causes. It really is how amazingly similar Athena's fake face is to the vast majority of internet "friendships" I think often friends online will say they are your friend but when it comes to really standing up for you like a real friend does, they don't. It is sad and also the reason why bullying is so easy online.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...