Skip to main content

War, Making Friends From Enemies // Jackson Riddle

    What is war? Some say war is spurred out of a deep passion in a man's heart to defend that which he holds dear. Others stand by their view that war is driven by overarching powers pushing those below them to fight, kill and ultimately die for a cause personal to the political leaders. Regarding the Iliad, I find that much of the passion behind the battle between the Achaeans and the Argives, while fueled by personal passions specific to each man, is mainly driven by the clash between Achilles and Agamemnon. Each man is compelled to fight for the honor of his country or city, ordered to fight valiantly and destroy the opposition. For the most part.
    As I was reading book six, several pages stood out from the others, pages 199 to 203, line numbers 138 to 282. In this passage, Homer takes a break from describing the war to writing about an encounter between two warriors of opposing forces, Glaucus and Diomedes, Glaucus defending the Achaeans and Diomedes defending the Argives. Instead of immediately jumping into battle, Diomedes asks his opponent "Who are you, my fine friend?-- another born to die? . . . But if you are an immortal come from the blue, I'm not the man to fight the gods of heaven." (Homer, 199). Glaucus procedes to tell his backstory, and the two find that they are not enemies, but are in fact old friends, and decide that their fate is not unnecessary slaughter of the other. They even encourage each other to kill as many men as they can! 
    Overall, I found this to be an interesting passage, because, as Homer described earlier, there are droves upon droves of men fighting to the death all around, but these two men decide to go against the methods of their peers. Instead of fighting for a leader who has a personal vendetta, they put aside their differences and find friendship on the battlefield. 

P.S. I commented on Micah Powers' post and Clabo

Comments

  1. IsabelleAugust 24, 2020 at 8:38 PM

    Let me just start off by saying, your entire post is written beautifully! I also enjoyed the Diomedes and Glaucus break. It almost seemed like Homer was trying to remind his audience that there is still light in the darkest of times. -Isabelle Ferguson

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more