Skip to main content

Greece, an Underrated Utopia // Ian Blair

     As I read Pericles give an absolute clinic on how to give an eloquent eulogium, I couldn't help but notice how similar Pericles made Athens seem to an ideal version of the United States, specifically in how the Athenians combined different aspects of cultures into their customs, effectively making them a diverse melting pot. Take honoring the dead for example: the Greeks took the bones of the deceased and had them organized in their respective tribes' coffins to be mourned. Those who die in battle are even buried in the same Beautiful suburb (Thucydides, 1), much like how the Egyptians buried a plethora of Pharaohs in what became known as the Valley of The Kings. Even though soldiers and pharaohs had different titles and duties, both were viewed in their respective cultures as significant figures in society and needed to be exalted after they passed.

    The second cultural aspect I observed is not one that the Athenians had in common with many of their neighbors at the time, but one that inspires an entire nation millennia afterwards: the development of a democracy (and more importantly, a constitution!). Pericles reminds the audience that honoring the fallen is not just about remembering the beginnings of Greece, but also what allowed her to rise in power:

"Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighbouring states; we are rather a pattern to others than imitators ourselves. Its administration favours the many instead of the few; this is why it is called a democracy." (Thucydides, 2).

The United States was founded on, and still uses, a democratic system inspired by the warrior-poets of the past. The Athenians created multiple political values and systems that point to Athens being ahead of their time in politics.

    The third cultural aspect I observed in my reading is in regards to the markets of Athens. Due to being so highly regarded and fascinating a city in the ancient world, the city officials wisely used Athens' reputation to establish trade markets, not unlike the Egyptians, Spartans, or any other nation with significant power and territory. These trade markets brought various fruits and other goods in to the city from around the known world. I thoroughly enjoyed this exert as it provided a glimpse, a window if you will, into what ancient Greek culture could have been like. 

P.S. I commented on Haley Morgan's and Jessef's posts. 

 

Comments

  1. While I did enjoy learning about the cultural and political development of Greece as a nation, I did find it strange how this seemed to be more emphasized than the hundreds of men who had just perished.

    Though they were buried with honors and given a special burial spot, I feel as though Pericles should have talked more about his brothers-at-arms than the nation that they died for. I understand that each man sacrificed himself for the greater good of his nation, but I couldn't help but think that the Greeks should have more generously returned the favor by speaking more about the people that were lost.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I wholeheartedly agree! The Bible in John chapter fifteen verse thirteen mentions that there is no greater love than laying down one's life for their friends. In the case of the deceased soldiers, they laid their lives down for not just their friends, but family and all of Athens as well. The soldiers should have been mentioned more, as they were the cause of the event happening in the first place, they should have also been the focal point of Pericles' speech. It seemed like everyone else was receiving praise except for those who lost their lives

      Delete
    3. I really enjoyed how you compared Athens democracy to America's democracy and how both played out similarly. I never would have thought of that, that Athens as well as America incorporated different cultures into their system. Now, aside from this, I think Pericles should have been a bit more sensitive to the crowd's grief in the latter half. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say he had good intentions though.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...