Skip to main content

If I Have to Repeat Repeat Myself One More Time - Caroline Tucker

 If I’m being completely honest, I always have a hard time writing a blog post about a play. This play is no different. I do not really understand why it is so hard but it always is.

From a literary standpoint, it was very interesting how often the Furies would repeat an entire paragraph twice. At one point the Furies repeat three different paragraph in one go. (Aeschylus, 245-247). While the Furies repeating themselves could be tiring, I think that it is very intriguing why they are repeating. I do not know the correct reason that the Furies repeat themselves. However, I have a few ideas as to why. 

The first reason that the Furies could have been repeating themselves is because it is some kind of chanting ritual or just a ritual in general. There could be some hidden meaning behind repeating themselves. The furies can be seen chanting or speaking as one through out the entire play. 

Another reason could be that Aeschylus wanted the audience to completely understand what the Furies were saying. When the Furies said something important or something that needed to stand out, Aeschylus would have the Furies repeat it. On the other hand, the reoccurrence of a passage could have been for the characters inside the play instead of for the audience. The passage could have been so important that the Furies wanted the other characters in the play to understand. That could have been why they repeated themselves.

What do you think? What was the reason Aeschylus had the Furies repeat themselves? Can you think of another reason why Aeschylus would do that?


P.s. I commented on Hailey Morgan’s and Isabelle’s posts.

Comments

  1. I noticed it as well and you are spot on. The Furies repeat themselves for the meaning in what they say and for the audience to hear it clearer. Another reason you may have glanced over is to make the actor's life easier. Homer did the same thing in the Iliad with sacrifices and many other metaphors so the actor can site the same few monologues 3 times rather than learn 28 different blocks of texts along with his dialogues.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was always taught that if you heard something repeated, it was important and you ought to take note of it. I think that stands true here! I think Aeschylus is trying to bring special attention to those passages for the audience. I think there had to have been a message he was trying to get across through the repetition, otherwise it seems futile.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know that in Scripture, many passages are repeated due to their importance. When the Furies repeated themselves, I think that they were emphasizing how important their message was, and just being the chaotic force that the Furies are. It kind of reminds me of the end of Honors classes, when everyone is saying "What's the blog post? What's the blog post?" If they would just listen, the mass force of everyone saying the same thing wouldn't be as chaotic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...