Skip to main content

If I Have to Repeat Repeat Myself One More Time - Caroline Tucker

 If I’m being completely honest, I always have a hard time writing a blog post about a play. This play is no different. I do not really understand why it is so hard but it always is.

From a literary standpoint, it was very interesting how often the Furies would repeat an entire paragraph twice. At one point the Furies repeat three different paragraph in one go. (Aeschylus, 245-247). While the Furies repeating themselves could be tiring, I think that it is very intriguing why they are repeating. I do not know the correct reason that the Furies repeat themselves. However, I have a few ideas as to why. 

The first reason that the Furies could have been repeating themselves is because it is some kind of chanting ritual or just a ritual in general. There could be some hidden meaning behind repeating themselves. The furies can be seen chanting or speaking as one through out the entire play. 

Another reason could be that Aeschylus wanted the audience to completely understand what the Furies were saying. When the Furies said something important or something that needed to stand out, Aeschylus would have the Furies repeat it. On the other hand, the reoccurrence of a passage could have been for the characters inside the play instead of for the audience. The passage could have been so important that the Furies wanted the other characters in the play to understand. That could have been why they repeated themselves.

What do you think? What was the reason Aeschylus had the Furies repeat themselves? Can you think of another reason why Aeschylus would do that?


P.s. I commented on Hailey Morgan’s and Isabelle’s posts.

Comments

  1. I noticed it as well and you are spot on. The Furies repeat themselves for the meaning in what they say and for the audience to hear it clearer. Another reason you may have glanced over is to make the actor's life easier. Homer did the same thing in the Iliad with sacrifices and many other metaphors so the actor can site the same few monologues 3 times rather than learn 28 different blocks of texts along with his dialogues.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was always taught that if you heard something repeated, it was important and you ought to take note of it. I think that stands true here! I think Aeschylus is trying to bring special attention to those passages for the audience. I think there had to have been a message he was trying to get across through the repetition, otherwise it seems futile.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know that in Scripture, many passages are repeated due to their importance. When the Furies repeated themselves, I think that they were emphasizing how important their message was, and just being the chaotic force that the Furies are. It kind of reminds me of the end of Honors classes, when everyone is saying "What's the blog post? What's the blog post?" If they would just listen, the mass force of everyone saying the same thing wouldn't be as chaotic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...