Skip to main content

The Republic vs. Fahrenheit 451–Lily Caswell

So censorship is a pretty big deal in today’s society, right? IMDB is the website my mom always goes to when she’s unsure of whether or not a movie is alright for my 12 year old sister to watch. In high school, I had to read a very interesting book called Fahrenheit 451, which happens to be one of the most interesting books I’ve ever read. It describes a futuristic American city in which books are forbidden and subsequently burned by “firemen”. The reason books became banned is because authors stopped putting controversial opinions in their books and it got to the point where books were banned altogether to keep people from getting offended. Sounds kind of similar to today, doesn’t it? Also in Fahrenheit 451, it talks about how children eventually are taught when they are in cribs so they can be taught what society wants them to be taught. 


In The Republic, Socrates says that guardians should “From childhood on, let them pattern themselves after men who are—among other things—courageous, temperate,reverent, and free.” (Plato, 92-93) While Socrates does not get as far to the point that Fahrenheit 451 does about censorship and raising children, he does say that censoring certain things is a good thing. I have to agree with Socrates on this. When I marry and have kids, there are certain things that while they will need to know, I won’t tell them until they are either old enough to understand or because my hand is forced and I have to tell them. I want to keep my younger sister from learning about certain things because while eventually she may find them out, I want her to stay as innocent as she can. Isn’t that what every sibling wants?


So while I don’t agree with the censorship in Fahrenheit 451, I think Socrates was onto something in his views of censorship. It should be more of a filter than a muzzle and should be used to weed out the bad things instead of just simply brushing the bad things under the rug.


I commented on Logan’s and ...

Comments

  1. Rachael GregsonSeptember 28, 2020 at 8:00 PM

    Lily, I loved how you compared Socrates to a protective parent wanting the best for their kids. In this case, the kids being the guardians. I think it is safe to say that a common ground exists between being too censored and then not enough censored and that steps should be taken so that neither one is crossed over.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Braylan StringfellowSeptember 28, 2020 at 8:02 PM

    I agree with your mom on how she looks out for bad things in movies to protect your sister. I definitely agree with you on how censorship should be a filter not a muzzle. I think what Socrates was getting at with censorship was to indoctrinate the youth about how the felt certain things should be, not how things really are.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more