Skip to main content

A Conflict with the Current Currency /////// Isabelle Ferguson

 I always imagined what it would be like if I had all the money in the world. Growing up, I always thought I would spend my money on brand new, working things for my mom. A house with working air and heat, a car that didn’t break down every three months, and all the designer clothes she could ever want. I also imagined giving the money to people and programs. The fine arts department at my high school, my church, and all my friends. I’m sure you’ve noticed: my money would be out like a light within the first few hours of me having it. Aristotle captures this in Book IV. This is about to take a sharp turn, so hold on to your diplomas. 
I have so many questions. Why is wealth, honor, and pride (predominantly wealth) the main focus of everything?  “The poor man cannot be magnificent because he has not the means with which to spend large sums fittingly” (Book IV, paragraph 2). But if he spends all he has on the right things and refuses to take from the bad things, is he not magnificent? Why is wealth the measure of everything? If the poor man gives 75% of what he has, but the magnificent man gives 25%, why is the magnificent man still magnificent? People are out there breaking their backs at work just to get slightly ahead, and it’s infuriating.  
The person who deserves riches the most doesn’t get it. Why? Oh, yeah. He gives it all away to help those who need it more. If you give away all your riches to help others you won't be rich. Yes, he donates his money and funds certain programs, but we don’t see Jeff Bezos offering to pay off student loan debt. It explains why the people who are the wealthiest alive are “the wealthiest.” You need education to get a good job, you need a job to pay for education, you need a car to get to the job and education, but you need money for the car, and it NEVER ENDS. This is the way of life, and has been for a long time. And it sucks. I vote we change the currency to something more significant than a something shiny, green, or decorative. 
P.S. I commented on Lily Caswell's post and Jessef Leslie's post.

Comments

  1. My business brain is crying for help... it is screaming NOOO!!! However, putting business aside, I can definitely see where you are coming from. I am constantly yelling “why does everything cost so much money?” It is like the saying “nothing is free”. And that is true. Everything costs something. Whether it is time or money. To get back on track, the big question we need to ask is, Is the wealthy man happy and content? I would assume and believe that the man who gives everything away is the happy and content man.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is what we give up to have an invisible hand in the free market. The market functions because of self-interest. The economy has to function off self-interest(off people working for money) because most individuals simply wouldn't do the work which needs to be done to create a product out of love for other people. Capitalism has its pros and cons.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...