Skip to main content

A Liberal Conservative? // Braylan Stringfellow

     In todays world, the terms liberal and conservative are considered to be so far apart and so different from each other. This is because of politics. But the term liberal in it of itself is not necessarily a bad thing like conservatives think. The word liberal can simply mean generous. I wouldn't think any conservative would say this is a bad thing. 

    When Aristotle is talking about the liberal man, he is not talking about democrats in todays government. What he is referring to is the same type of man found in the Bible in the book of Proverbs. Proverbs 11:25 says, "The liberal soul shall be made fat" (KJV). This means that someone who is generous or liberal will be blessed beyond measure or be made fat. 

    Aristotle says that the liberal man is praised for his actions. When we as Christians are liberal in our giving in our tithes and offerings, we are, in essence, praised by God and rewarded by Him. 

    I am a conservative in my political stance, but I try to be liberal when it comes to giving and what God says about it. So in essence, I am a Liberal Conservative.

I commented on Haylee Lynd's and Jamie Peters' post

Comments

  1. Hi Braylan! You made a unique comparison in your blog post. I find it interesting that Aristotle's definition of liberality is so close to the Biblical definition. Politically, the term means something totally different. This goes to show how skewed a meaning can become over time when taken out of context.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wasn't expecting your blog post to say what it said, but after reading it, I truly agree with you. It's amazing that words become polarized and stigmatized, when in the end, we should strive to be conservative in some things, liberal in others, and loving in all things. I like your blog post and how it's straight to the point. Good post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice comparison to bring up the opposing political parties in paragraph one, I think we often get the sense that opposing parties means opposing definitions of everything and that is simply not the case in U.S. politics. Sometimes I wonder why we should not just abolish the political party system and look to what God says like you did here. Good post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh boy, do I love talking about politics! (that's sarcasm by the way, please don't talk to me about politics). All notes aside though, I did find it odd that Aristotle's definition of the word 'liberal' was so different from the modern connotation of liberalism. While it certainly is strange, in a way, the word liberal is actually quite similar to liberalism, though not exactly the same. For example, liberalism is all about the wealthy giving to the unfortunate, which according to Aristotle, is what a liberal man should do. It's interesting to see how much the meanings of words can change.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...