Skip to main content

A Liberal Conservative? // Braylan Stringfellow

     In todays world, the terms liberal and conservative are considered to be so far apart and so different from each other. This is because of politics. But the term liberal in it of itself is not necessarily a bad thing like conservatives think. The word liberal can simply mean generous. I wouldn't think any conservative would say this is a bad thing. 

    When Aristotle is talking about the liberal man, he is not talking about democrats in todays government. What he is referring to is the same type of man found in the Bible in the book of Proverbs. Proverbs 11:25 says, "The liberal soul shall be made fat" (KJV). This means that someone who is generous or liberal will be blessed beyond measure or be made fat. 

    Aristotle says that the liberal man is praised for his actions. When we as Christians are liberal in our giving in our tithes and offerings, we are, in essence, praised by God and rewarded by Him. 

    I am a conservative in my political stance, but I try to be liberal when it comes to giving and what God says about it. So in essence, I am a Liberal Conservative.

I commented on Haylee Lynd's and Jamie Peters' post

Comments

  1. Hi Braylan! You made a unique comparison in your blog post. I find it interesting that Aristotle's definition of liberality is so close to the Biblical definition. Politically, the term means something totally different. This goes to show how skewed a meaning can become over time when taken out of context.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wasn't expecting your blog post to say what it said, but after reading it, I truly agree with you. It's amazing that words become polarized and stigmatized, when in the end, we should strive to be conservative in some things, liberal in others, and loving in all things. I like your blog post and how it's straight to the point. Good post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice comparison to bring up the opposing political parties in paragraph one, I think we often get the sense that opposing parties means opposing definitions of everything and that is simply not the case in U.S. politics. Sometimes I wonder why we should not just abolish the political party system and look to what God says like you did here. Good post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh boy, do I love talking about politics! (that's sarcasm by the way, please don't talk to me about politics). All notes aside though, I did find it odd that Aristotle's definition of the word 'liberal' was so different from the modern connotation of liberalism. While it certainly is strange, in a way, the word liberal is actually quite similar to liberalism, though not exactly the same. For example, liberalism is all about the wealthy giving to the unfortunate, which according to Aristotle, is what a liberal man should do. It's interesting to see how much the meanings of words can change.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...