Skip to main content

"I got a rock" -Charlie Brown

        I don't know about you, but I had to read through the first section of the reading quite a few times to make sure I fully understood what the heck was going on. When I finally realized that the words on the page were telling me that Kronos ate his children and I was not misinterpreting things, I actually found a parallel to the story of Moses...

        In Hesoid, Selections from the Theogony, we discover that Kronos ate each of his children because he had been told that he would  "be subdued by his own child" (Banks). However, Rhea, the woman who bore Kronos' children, planned to keep the youngest child, Zeus. She wrapped a stone in cloth and Kronos,(obviously a genius) ate the stone, thinking it was Zeus. 

    Now look at the story of Moses. In Exodus 1 Pharaoh becomes king and begins trying to eliminate the Israelites saying "Look... The Israelites have become far too numerous for us. Come, we must deal shrewdly with them or they will become even more numerous and, if war breaks out,  will join our enemies, fight against us and leave the country" (Exodus 1:9-0). Pharaoh then ordered that every Hebrew boy be thrown into the Nile. However, Moses was hidden and eventually saved by Pharaoh's daughter. 

    In both stories, the man in power is intimidated and works to eliminate any possibility of defeat. In Hesoid, Zeus is spared and later comes to power and defeats his father, and in Exodus, Moses is spared and becomes a very influential man, saving his people. 

    So, while eating children and having them thrown into the water are different, both were evil attempts to secure the power of one man at the cost of many. 


Hesiod, Selections from the Theogony(8thcent. BC), translated by J. Banks, at https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/5289


Commented on Clabo's post and Micah's

Comments

  1. I never thought to make that comparison myself, but it is a fitting one. Like you said, eating your own children and throwing them in the water are two different atrocities, but I think the reason why Kronos' was so evil was to showcase their 'god-like' cruelty. Also, I think this was done almost theatrically, to have some grand evil for the hero (Zeus) to overcome, and to prove why he is good.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haley, thank you so much for reminding me of that scene in Charlie Brown. It used to always make me laugh as a kid. I also really liked how you compared the similarities between Moses and Zeus and how both overcame odds specifically set against them. There were a lot of ways that scenes in the Theogony and the Bible could liken to one another (despite their many, many differences).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just couldn't help myself, the title just seemed fitting.

      Delete
  3. First off, I love the title. Secondly, I really liked your connection between Moses and Zeus. I was trying to think of a connection, but I think yours is probably the most accurate. Either that, or Herod's order to kill the Jewish boys because of the prophesies regarding Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also, in both stories, it is a woman who saves the boy in each story. For Moses, it is the wife of Pharaoh, the man who Moses will save the Israelites from. For Zeus, it is Rhea, the wife of Kronos, the man who Zeus will save his brothers and sisters from. It's a very good parallel. Good post.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...