Skip to main content

If Democracy is Flawed, then Wouldn't that Mean . . . - Hailey Morgan

Are we living in a flawed society here in the U.S.? Without a doubt, the answer to this question is yes, yes we are. (I'm sorry if I offended anyone). 

The way in which Socrates describes democracy as the inferior method of governing a nation is concerning since this is the very form of government that we are subject to. In his mind, abandoning everything in the name of freedom is one of the worst things a nation can do. While I do agree that some people can take their freedoms a bit too far (Karens) or twist the meaning of what their freedoms allow (also Karens), I would much rather live in a nation with freedom as its basis. 

Socrates also believes, that purposely putting the wealthiest people in the highest positions of power is not only extremely unfair and highly biased, but it rapidly increases the overall level of governmental corruption. I have to say, I wholeheartedly agree with the philosopher on this one.

What do you guys think? Do we need to pay more attention to what  Socrates has to say about democracy?

 Edit - Replied to Kaitlyn Terry and Haylee Lynd.

Comments

  1. IsabelleOctober 6, 2020 at 8:38 AM

    It's surprising this book has not been burned by the nationalists who believe our country is without fault. I whole heartedly agree with you! In order to run a campaign, you need money. That's why we rarely see leaders of lower middle class or lower class taking up leadership positions. America is a prime example of how right Socrates was. I love your post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ian BlairOctober 6, 2020 at 9:20 AM

    I personally believe that Socrates has a point on the wealthiest people being in power, but mainly because of his further points on education rather than social status and popularity. Too often we let someone's status define who we think they are rather than their personality. Great thought-provoking post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more