Skip to main content

Is this the Book of Numbers?? // Jackson Riddle

 As I read through this "brief" list of how the ancient gods came to be and their lineage, I was immediately reminded of the book of Numbers in the Bible, when God told Moses to get "a census of all the congregation of the people of Israel . . . all in Israel who are able to go to war, you and Aaron shall list them, company by company" (Numbers 1:2-3). While I'm hesitant to say that the Bible can be boring, I think some of you can agree with me that this book of the Bible dragged on quite a bit, not unlike this passage. 

One thing that also caught my attention was Rhea's efforts to hide the birth of Zeus from her husband Kronos, who was busy eating his offspring because of his awareness that he was fated to be brought down by his own child. I mentioned this before in a separate blog post, but how is it that these immortal, supposedly omniscient beings, are able to be deceived? Similarly to how Zeus was seduced by Hera in The Iliad to further her ulterior motives, Kronos is deceived by his wife Rhea so that Zeus can be birthed and can one day fulfill his destiny. I just find it interesting that the ancient Greeks believed that the same gods who could easily be manipulated and tricked were the gods that held the ultimate authority over their world, thus contradicting their supposed "all-power". 


Edit: I commented on Clabo's post and Hailey Morgan's post.


Comments

  1. I love this thought process. Ultimately what it comes down to is that any fallible god is not in fact a God. I am reminded of the line from Ivan Vanko in Iron man II, "If you could make god bleed, People will cease to believe in him." We see later on in avengers infinity war Iron man draws a drop of blood. I know that is slightly unrelated but it gave Tony Stark a hope to defeat Thanos. In Christianity we have this picture of our God the father as absolutely infallible and undefeated, which is absolutely true, but we see Jesus submit to death accepting our punishment then rising in defeat of death unlike any man. We saw our God bleed but by his bloodshed we are redeemed. It is an interesting thing to dig into and it would take many books to truly understand. Frankly I don't completely understand the dichotomy of God dying yet being immortal but I think it kind of reflects my other comment on what death truly is; separation from the Father of all.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...