Skip to main content

Is this the Book of Numbers?? // Jackson Riddle

 As I read through this "brief" list of how the ancient gods came to be and their lineage, I was immediately reminded of the book of Numbers in the Bible, when God told Moses to get "a census of all the congregation of the people of Israel . . . all in Israel who are able to go to war, you and Aaron shall list them, company by company" (Numbers 1:2-3). While I'm hesitant to say that the Bible can be boring, I think some of you can agree with me that this book of the Bible dragged on quite a bit, not unlike this passage. 

One thing that also caught my attention was Rhea's efforts to hide the birth of Zeus from her husband Kronos, who was busy eating his offspring because of his awareness that he was fated to be brought down by his own child. I mentioned this before in a separate blog post, but how is it that these immortal, supposedly omniscient beings, are able to be deceived? Similarly to how Zeus was seduced by Hera in The Iliad to further her ulterior motives, Kronos is deceived by his wife Rhea so that Zeus can be birthed and can one day fulfill his destiny. I just find it interesting that the ancient Greeks believed that the same gods who could easily be manipulated and tricked were the gods that held the ultimate authority over their world, thus contradicting their supposed "all-power". 


Edit: I commented on Clabo's post and Hailey Morgan's post.


Comments

  1. Micah PowersOctober 20, 2020 at 8:39 AM

    I love this thought process. Ultimately what it comes down to is that any fallible god is not in fact a God. I am reminded of the line from Ivan Vanko in Iron man II, "If you could make god bleed, People will cease to believe in him." We see later on in avengers infinity war Iron man draws a drop of blood. I know that is slightly unrelated but it gave Tony Stark a hope to defeat Thanos. In Christianity we have this picture of our God the father as absolutely infallible and undefeated, which is absolutely true, but we see Jesus submit to death accepting our punishment then rising in defeat of death unlike any man. We saw our God bleed but by his bloodshed we are redeemed. It is an interesting thing to dig into and it would take many books to truly understand. Frankly I don't completely understand the dichotomy of God dying yet being immortal but I think it kind of reflects my other comment on what death truly is; separation from the Father of all.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more