Skip to main content

Jesus in Greece - Jamie Peters

     Alright, there was a LOT that happened in this reading assignment, and since we are most likely writing papers on this soon, I will focus in on one part of this book. If Plato's Republic isn't about Jesus, I'm gonna slap someone. The entirety of the cave analogy is exactly what it is like to receive Jesus, learn more about him, and then go back out into a dying world to bring the healing we have been given. More specifically, the picture painted by Plato is what it is like to go to the University of Mobile. We attend here because we want to be here; we learn about subjects outside of the standard course of study. We are not here to "...prolong [our] education endlessly... [becoming] incapable of action" (7.519c). We are being trained to go, to be ready to lead in the world, not just in terms of intellectual excellence, but in a Christian capacity. Much like the philosophers of Plato's day, Christians make up a small percentage of the world, but our light shines brighter than all others. We are much despised even though we have the truth, and we are considered in terms of those who bring Christians a bad name. It brings me joy to see God's hand in everything, even in philosophy such as this. 

There is so much more to be said about this book, from the blatant terror that comes from reading chapter eight to the different type of terror that comes from actually considering an aristocracy as a good form of government. I want to hear your thoughts about Jesus in this, though. What do you guys think?


I commented on Haylee Lynd's and Isabelle's posts.

Comments

  1. Jamie, I really love how you brought attention to this! Your blog reminds me of the Bible verse Matthew 5:14: "You are the light of the world. A city built on a hill cannot be hidden." Both the Republic and the Gospel urge us to spread the word and raise awareness about something. For the Republic, it's education. For the Gospel, it's Christ.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I complete agree, Jamie! (Plus, I really don’t want to get slapped by you.) Even throughout the past few books of The Republic, Socrates didn’t talk directly about there being one God, but man did he come close. You also reminded me of Matthew 5:10 where it says “Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” We’re not here on earth to just sit on the sidelines and watch the world go down; we’re here because God put us on this earth at this time for our individual purpose.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...