Skip to main content

Jupiter for President//Haylee Lynd

      In the Bible's version of the flood, those who survive,  Noah and his family, are those who were considered righteous by God. In the flood invoked by Jupiter, those who survive, Deaucalion and his wife, were not chosen to survive. They simply did and just so happened to be loyal to the gods. The story says that Jupiter saw that they had survived and thus decided to end the flood. He did not have the knowledge that they were going to survive. This difference in versions of the flood story is fascinating. Yet, that is not the only thing which caught my attention. In Jupiter's opening dialogue justifying why he is going to cause a flood, he states that "the incurable flesh must be excised by the knife, so that the healthy part is not affected"(Ovid I 177-198). He proceeds to say that the healthy parts are the demigods and that the gods should allow them to at least live in safety on the earth since they are not to be allowed in heaven. Thus, Jupiter wishes to get rid of the evil on the earth for the safety of the gods' children. However, this reasoning and goal seems to be forgotten when he floods the earth because, as I said before, only Deaucalion and his wife survive.

     Jupiter's true reason for flooding the earth was he was angry. He was angry with Lycaon for trying to trick him. He was angry for the disrespect of the gods done by humans. He uses an emotional appeal towards the other gods by saying he must flood the earth for the safety of their children, and his speech stirs the gods to agreement. While the text says that the gods demand the punishment of Lycaon for committing such terrible actions against a god, Jupiter later stirs them to demand punishment for all of the human race, and he does not spare his children in his anger.

    Jupiter's casting of vision for what he is going to do seems rather justified, or at least it appeals to the gods. However, Jupiter does not actually enact his goal. He truly has a different reason behind what he wishes to do, behind the flood. This story made me think of how some politicians or groups will cast a vision or give the goal behind something they are doing, but when it comes time to do the thing which they are doing, they do not accomplish the goal. This may be an odd place for my mind to have gone when reading this story, but I could not help but draw the parallel. 


P.S. I commented on Hailey Riddle 's and Isabelle 's posts.

Comments

  1. I really like your blog post! It made me think about how thankful I am that the true God is truthful and righteous. He is just and has sent a flood, similar to the story of Jupiter, but His had a story of redemption within it and was truly just, rather than a blind act of rage that swept through the innocent and the guilty.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...