Skip to main content

Jupiter for President//Haylee Lynd

      In the Bible's version of the flood, those who survive,  Noah and his family, are those who were considered righteous by God. In the flood invoked by Jupiter, those who survive, Deaucalion and his wife, were not chosen to survive. They simply did and just so happened to be loyal to the gods. The story says that Jupiter saw that they had survived and thus decided to end the flood. He did not have the knowledge that they were going to survive. This difference in versions of the flood story is fascinating. Yet, that is not the only thing which caught my attention. In Jupiter's opening dialogue justifying why he is going to cause a flood, he states that "the incurable flesh must be excised by the knife, so that the healthy part is not affected"(Ovid I 177-198). He proceeds to say that the healthy parts are the demigods and that the gods should allow them to at least live in safety on the earth since they are not to be allowed in heaven. Thus, Jupiter wishes to get rid of the evil on the earth for the safety of the gods' children. However, this reasoning and goal seems to be forgotten when he floods the earth because, as I said before, only Deaucalion and his wife survive.

     Jupiter's true reason for flooding the earth was he was angry. He was angry with Lycaon for trying to trick him. He was angry for the disrespect of the gods done by humans. He uses an emotional appeal towards the other gods by saying he must flood the earth for the safety of their children, and his speech stirs the gods to agreement. While the text says that the gods demand the punishment of Lycaon for committing such terrible actions against a god, Jupiter later stirs them to demand punishment for all of the human race, and he does not spare his children in his anger.

    Jupiter's casting of vision for what he is going to do seems rather justified, or at least it appeals to the gods. However, Jupiter does not actually enact his goal. He truly has a different reason behind what he wishes to do, behind the flood. This story made me think of how some politicians or groups will cast a vision or give the goal behind something they are doing, but when it comes time to do the thing which they are doing, they do not accomplish the goal. This may be an odd place for my mind to have gone when reading this story, but I could not help but draw the parallel. 


P.S. I commented on Hailey Riddle 's and Isabelle 's posts.

Comments

  1. I really like your blog post! It made me think about how thankful I am that the true God is truthful and righteous. He is just and has sent a flood, similar to the story of Jupiter, but His had a story of redemption within it and was truly just, rather than a blind act of rage that swept through the innocent and the guilty.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...