Skip to main content

Jupiter for President//Haylee Lynd

      In the Bible's version of the flood, those who survive,  Noah and his family, are those who were considered righteous by God. In the flood invoked by Jupiter, those who survive, Deaucalion and his wife, were not chosen to survive. They simply did and just so happened to be loyal to the gods. The story says that Jupiter saw that they had survived and thus decided to end the flood. He did not have the knowledge that they were going to survive. This difference in versions of the flood story is fascinating. Yet, that is not the only thing which caught my attention. In Jupiter's opening dialogue justifying why he is going to cause a flood, he states that "the incurable flesh must be excised by the knife, so that the healthy part is not affected"(Ovid I 177-198). He proceeds to say that the healthy parts are the demigods and that the gods should allow them to at least live in safety on the earth since they are not to be allowed in heaven. Thus, Jupiter wishes to get rid of the evil on the earth for the safety of the gods' children. However, this reasoning and goal seems to be forgotten when he floods the earth because, as I said before, only Deaucalion and his wife survive.

     Jupiter's true reason for flooding the earth was he was angry. He was angry with Lycaon for trying to trick him. He was angry for the disrespect of the gods done by humans. He uses an emotional appeal towards the other gods by saying he must flood the earth for the safety of their children, and his speech stirs the gods to agreement. While the text says that the gods demand the punishment of Lycaon for committing such terrible actions against a god, Jupiter later stirs them to demand punishment for all of the human race, and he does not spare his children in his anger.

    Jupiter's casting of vision for what he is going to do seems rather justified, or at least it appeals to the gods. However, Jupiter does not actually enact his goal. He truly has a different reason behind what he wishes to do, behind the flood. This story made me think of how some politicians or groups will cast a vision or give the goal behind something they are doing, but when it comes time to do the thing which they are doing, they do not accomplish the goal. This may be an odd place for my mind to have gone when reading this story, but I could not help but draw the parallel. 


P.S. I commented on Hailey Riddle 's and Isabelle 's posts.

Comments

  1. I really like your blog post! It made me think about how thankful I am that the true God is truthful and righteous. He is just and has sent a flood, similar to the story of Jupiter, but His had a story of redemption within it and was truly just, rather than a blind act of rage that swept through the innocent and the guilty.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...