Skip to main content

Live by it, die by it // Ian Blair

     Call me crazy, but I would conjecture that those who use fear as a tool to achieve their goals are never actually satisfied with their work because they spend all their time being afraid of someone using their own tactics on them. Socrates in Book IX details the Tyrant's power struggle and how the tyrannical man never forges alliances or friendships due to always being weary of anyone he has not payed off to guard him and his possessions. It reminds me of when the Bible addresses that those who live by the sword will die by the sword, which basically translates to you get what you give. If someone oppresses others, then who is really the winner in that scenario? Spoiler alert, it's nobody at all!

    I remember a moment from a television series that can really put the Tyrant's struggle in perspective, and how tyranny will inevitably undo itself. Within the masterful storytelling of the third season of Transformers Prime, Megatron himself has spent the majority of a year being nothing more than a vessel host for a greater evil in the story. After he breaks his connection with the evil and retakes control of what remains of his tattered form, he has a bit of a stand-off with Optimus where he delivers a powerful punchline that really speaks volumes to the wisdom he learns over the season, "No! . . . There will be no further conflict, no further energon shed upon this rock, the Decepticons are abolished from this moment forth! . . . Because I now know the true meaning of oppression, and have thus lost my lust for inflicting it..." In the tyrant's case, he uses fear and oppression as necessary tools to rise to power, only to find that once in power there is no incentive to keep climbing. Power is not something that is a necessary evil, but rather something to is to be used in the kindness and service to others who are not fortunate enough to gain power in the first place. What do you think about the qualities of a tyrant? Is there anything that you would add?

Comments

  1. Lily CaswellOctober 15, 2020 at 7:40 AM

    “You reap what you sow” is a very applicable statement to the tyrant. I think that sometimes people become tyrants somewhat unwillingly; they get control of power and then their ambition to get more power overtakes them. I really like how you said that power is not necessarily evil. I think that because the tyrant is always stepping on other peoples toes to get what he wants, he’s constantly paranoid that someone will step on his toes (e.g. overthrowing/killing him).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more