Skip to main content

Live by it, die by it // Ian Blair

     Call me crazy, but I would conjecture that those who use fear as a tool to achieve their goals are never actually satisfied with their work because they spend all their time being afraid of someone using their own tactics on them. Socrates in Book IX details the Tyrant's power struggle and how the tyrannical man never forges alliances or friendships due to always being weary of anyone he has not payed off to guard him and his possessions. It reminds me of when the Bible addresses that those who live by the sword will die by the sword, which basically translates to you get what you give. If someone oppresses others, then who is really the winner in that scenario? Spoiler alert, it's nobody at all!

    I remember a moment from a television series that can really put the Tyrant's struggle in perspective, and how tyranny will inevitably undo itself. Within the masterful storytelling of the third season of Transformers Prime, Megatron himself has spent the majority of a year being nothing more than a vessel host for a greater evil in the story. After he breaks his connection with the evil and retakes control of what remains of his tattered form, he has a bit of a stand-off with Optimus where he delivers a powerful punchline that really speaks volumes to the wisdom he learns over the season, "No! . . . There will be no further conflict, no further energon shed upon this rock, the Decepticons are abolished from this moment forth! . . . Because I now know the true meaning of oppression, and have thus lost my lust for inflicting it..." In the tyrant's case, he uses fear and oppression as necessary tools to rise to power, only to find that once in power there is no incentive to keep climbing. Power is not something that is a necessary evil, but rather something to is to be used in the kindness and service to others who are not fortunate enough to gain power in the first place. What do you think about the qualities of a tyrant? Is there anything that you would add?

Comments

  1. “You reap what you sow” is a very applicable statement to the tyrant. I think that sometimes people become tyrants somewhat unwillingly; they get control of power and then their ambition to get more power overtakes them. I really like how you said that power is not necessarily evil. I think that because the tyrant is always stepping on other peoples toes to get what he wants, he’s constantly paranoid that someone will step on his toes (e.g. overthrowing/killing him).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...